This just in- Physics proves WB superior
#71
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Eastern PA USA
Hey, I go on vacation for one week, and look what you guys have been up to.[8D]
These threads are always entertaining though. Right up there with Mathews bows as a hot-button issue.
These threads are always entertaining though. Right up there with Mathews bows as a hot-button issue.
#72
A "mountain of torn up fletching"? Wouldn't that be good for business?

I certanly dont try to twist any ones arm to buy what I preferr over the WB
but anyone who comes back after buying one to complain about it eating up their fletchings cant say I didnt tell them so
#73
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: Pine Hill Alabama USA
I certanly dont try to twist any ones arm to buy what I preferr over the WB but anyone who comes back after buying one to complain about it eating up their fletchings cant say I didnt tell them so
#74
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
Likes: 0
Arthur, In this case, if you were using the same arrow shaft, could it have been a spine problem?
I don't know how well the Blazers work or don't but I wonder if this was an issue with the vanes lacking control because they don't offer enough stabilization, or they lacked control because spine was too weak with the heavier tips..
I don't know how well the Blazers work or don't but I wonder if this was an issue with the vanes lacking control because they don't offer enough stabilization, or they lacked control because spine was too weak with the heavier tips..
#75
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
BowFan:
BS! I have heard that cry too often. Evaluation based on personal use or observing the use (test) is "performance evaluation." Ever hear of "design evaluation" where the design and intended and predicted performance is weighed (evaluated) against a historical information base regarding known application and performance requirements? Manufacturers would dance in the streets if all their products were evaluated only by purchase and use.
Because of its design, I would not ever consider using the rest. However, that is my personal opinion and choice.
A good way to earn credibility around here is to form a biased (good or bad ) opinion of a product based on ones own trials!
Because of its design, I would not ever consider using the rest. However, that is my personal opinion and choice.
#76
Jeff, if anything, my arrows were way overspine with broadheads less than 100 gns. Besides, I had established my baseline arrow flight/accuracy with all my test broadheads using the same arrows fletched with 4" feathers before refletching with the Blazers. I am convinced it was lack of stabilization on the larger heads.
#77
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
BS! I have heard that cry too often. Evaluation based on personal use or observing the use (test) is "performance evaluation." Ever hear of "design evaluation" where the design and intended and predicted performance is weighed (evaluated) against a historical information base regarding known application and performance requirements?
Here's what you wrote:
Evaluation based on personal use or observing the use (test) is "performance evaluation." Ever hear of "design evaluation" where the design and intended and predicted performance is weighed (evaluated) against a historical information base regarding known application and performance requirements?
Non credible opinions based on design of said product without any actual trial of the product , based solely on the lack of desire to think outside the box or except that new innovations could possibly exist that would go against the grain of old standards , ie to be set in ones ways.
Anyway , "performance evaluation" holds ten fold the credibility over "design evaluation"!
Manufacturers would dance in the streets if all their products were evaluated only by purchase and use.
Thats after everyone laughed at their idea in the beginning. I'd like to thank those true pioneers of "performance evaluation" who were the first to try the WB!
#78
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: c903
atlas:
You need to step back and take a deep breath. You get too distraught and spend too much time unnecessarily listing quotes and posting your corresponding response.
You may be trying too hard too prematurely advance your archery/bowhunting related knowledge. In doing so, you take some things said too personally and become so upset you tend to start rebutting in a nonsensical interpretation and manner.
atlas:
You need to step back and take a deep breath. You get too distraught and spend too much time unnecessarily listing quotes and posting your corresponding response.
You may be trying too hard too prematurely advance your archery/bowhunting related knowledge. In doing so, you take some things said too personally and become so upset you tend to start rebutting in a nonsensical interpretation and manner.
Either you don't know what that word means or you are reading waaay too much into my posts.Did ya see it??........you almost made it through a post without a personal insult trying to bring someone else down in an attempt to make yourself look better.........almost.
You are right out of the textbooks

So are you ever gonna address your angry overreaction to a simple joke that started all this............or just keep pretending it was me that "can dish it out but can't take it"


#79
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: BOWFANATIC
Credibility is earned!
Credibility is earned!
ORIGINAL: c903
BS! I have heard that cry too often.
BS! I have heard that cry too often.
That is priceless..............coming from a guy who publicly turns his nose up at anyone who HE considers not experienced enough to voice an opinion.
I can't even believe you wrote that!! [
]
#80
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
ORIGINAL: Bigpapascout
Marketing is a great tool to brain wash the publick in believing something is superior over a different brand.
but then you hear first hand of things that arent so perfect about the product and you want to criticize the messanger?
Marketing is a great tool to brain wash the publick in believing something is superior over a different brand.
but then you hear first hand of things that arent so perfect about the product and you want to criticize the messanger?
I don't see full page ads in every magazine out there and I have seen them on hunting shows no more then others.
I think people bought them, liked them and shared that experience with friends...........that is the best marketing machine you can ask for.


