View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll
Antler Restrictions
#51
RE: Antler Restrictions
ORIGINAL: BOWFANATIC
It'sstill difficult to see from where I'm standing.If EAB isn't producingenough doe kills to please theDNR , how will antler restrictions?
You also make it sound like antler restrictions might also increase the doe harvest , as if it's intent is to grow big bucks and a bigger doe harvest might just be an added bonus.
The way I understand it's the other way around. It's (AR) intent is to get people to shoot more doe instead of shooting any buck.
Now , if people aren't shooting enough doe with EAB in place , how will AR change their minds and get them to shoot more doe?
I don't think that it's that difficult to see that with AR in place less bucks will be killed. Also it is possible that more people will kill does with AR in place. Therefore, less bucks being killed and more does being killed equals improved buck/doe ratio.
You also make it sound like antler restrictions might also increase the doe harvest , as if it's intent is to grow big bucks and a bigger doe harvest might just be an added bonus.
The way I understand it's the other way around. It's (AR) intent is to get people to shoot more doe instead of shooting any buck.
Now , if people aren't shooting enough doe with EAB in place , how will AR change their minds and get them to shoot more doe?
I guess what I have been sayingmay seem a little confusing.
I misspoke in my last post and made it sound like ARs would bring the population down. I have actually been trying to make the point that it would bring the buck to doe ratio closer to check and therefore create a healthier population.
Sorry for the confusion.
#52
RE: Antler Restrictions
ORIGINAL: BOWFANATIC
It'sstill difficult to see from where I'm standing.If EAB isn't producingenough doe kills to please theDNR , how will antler restrictions?
You also make it sound like antler restrictions might also increase the doe harvest , as if it's intent is to grow big bucks and a bigger doe harvest might just be an added bonus.
The way I understand it's the other way around. It's (AR) intent is to get people to shoot more doe instead of shooting any buck.
Now , if people aren't shooting enough doe with EAB in place , how will AR change their minds and get them to shoot more doe?
I don't think that it's that difficult to see that with AR in place less bucks will be killed. Also it is possible that more people will kill does with AR in place. Therefore, less bucks being killed and more does being killed equals improved buck/doe ratio.
You also make it sound like antler restrictions might also increase the doe harvest , as if it's intent is to grow big bucks and a bigger doe harvest might just be an added bonus.
The way I understand it's the other way around. It's (AR) intent is to get people to shoot more doe instead of shooting any buck.
Now , if people aren't shooting enough doe with EAB in place , how will AR change their minds and get them to shoot more doe?
I don't know why you think that EAB isn't working. I just read an article where the DNR is claiming that EAB is working and is one of the reasons that older, bigger bucks were being tagged by hunters this year.
#53
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
RE: Antler Restrictions
I don't know why you think that EAB isn't working. I just read an article where the DNR is claiming that EAB is working and is one of the reasons that older, bigger bucks were being tagged by hunters this year.
#54
RE: Antler Restrictions
I think that their goal was dual purpose... shoot more does and produce bigger( older ) bucks. Its perfect. I suppose that harvesting bigger bucks would take the sting out of another EAB season. It seems that people are enjoying shooting bigger bucks.
#55
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: moore oklahoma USA,right now in Korea
Posts: 335
RE: Antler Restrictions
no ar's in oklahoma, i would go for a earn abuck ruleand since we get three buck tagslet the hunters take one whatever buck and the other two meet an antler restriction rule.
#56
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,435
RE: Antler Restrictions
Do you actually think that a DNR has implimented ARs to produce trophy bucks?
#57
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
RE: Antler Restrictions
In Wisconsin it's all about trying to get hunters to shoot more doe. I do most of my hunting in a unit (63A) that has a population problem and has been EAB every year that EAB was utilized. I would be in favor of at least trying antler restrictions if it would keep the zone-t hunts out of October.
#58
RE: Antler Restrictions
It is my opinion that T-zone hunts at the end of october...suck! You really won't see deer in a relaxed state for the rest of the season. It may also cause rutting activity to take place at night.
#59
RE: Antler Restrictions
ORIGINAL: Sylvan
I don't know about Wisonsin but here in NY we have one management unit that has recently been made an AR unit. 3 points on a side. The DEC said that they have agreed to do this "experimentally" as the result of pressure from local hunting groups to increase the average size of bucks in the unit. Their position regarding ARwas, in a meeting I attended, that they didn't see a need for it from a management perspective but they would also consider it in other units if that's what the sportsman wanted.
Do you actually think that a DNR has implimented ARs to produce trophy bucks?
Anyways, thanks for the info. I would be interested to see what happens in that unit.