NRA - Obama Ad
#51
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
Would that be the view that raises taxes?
Would that be the view that raises taxes?
Oh, yeah, the economic boom of the 90's! That would be the economic boom wave that "Reganomics" started!
yes the eonomic boom of the 90's--balanced budget,lower taxes,surpluss not deficit, and low fuel cost. We had none of these with your beloved "Reganomics". If reganomics started this how come it did not happen till the mid 90's and not 10 years earlier. This is the same arguement I here all the time. Regonomics had nothing to do with the economy of the 90's.
The bible says " Let those who WILL Not work, not eat!"
I AM "Union!" AND, the Republican Party IS NOT perfect! However, I CANNOT support a party that kills babies
I AM "Union!" AND, the Republican Party IS NOT perfect! However, I CANNOT support a party that kills babies
Here we go quoting the bible again. What ever happened to seperation of church and state.
Yes, I agree with you. Those whowill not work should not eat. But what about those who CANNOT work. What abouthealthcare. What about "IGive me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
I am tired of everyone making political judgements based on religious beliefs. I have no problem with you running your life based on a book written 2000 years ago but our free country should be run by a qualified individual and not someone who bases everything soley on religion. That is the foundation of this country. If you believe religion should control the masses then move to the Middle East.
And if you think letting a woman do to her body what her basic human rights allow her to is wrong then you support taking away the right to freedom and choice. If you take away freedom and choice, you take away the second amendment(you know the one we all on this forum are fighting for)
#52
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
ORIGINAL: Downsouth13
Jimbo I respect your post. Its way more to freedom than owning a gun. For all of you who are ignorant to actual gun control legislation, it is virtually impossible to take the nations right to own a hand gun away.
Jimbo I respect your post. Its way more to freedom than owning a gun. For all of you who are ignorant to actual gun control legislation, it is virtually impossible to take the nations right to own a hand gun away.
ORIGINAL: ipscshooter
jimbo... you don't have a clue.
jimbo... you don't have a clue.
#53
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
ORIGINAL: 700Rem
Jimbo--
Not being a smart arse,but let me see isf I can guess your age...hhhmmmm I'd say around 23,24 tops...
There are alot of surprises in life,you just havent lived long enuff to experience most of them yet...Osama my arse...
Jimbo--
Not being a smart arse,but let me see isf I can guess your age...hhhmmmm I'd say around 23,24 tops...
There are alot of surprises in life,you just havent lived long enuff to experience most of them yet...Osama my arse...
#54
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
ORIGINAL: jimbodwb
This statement alone goes to show how media brainwashing can work.
yes the eonomic boom of the 90's--balanced budget,lower taxes,surpluss not deficit, and low fuel cost. We had none of these with your beloved "Reganomics". If reganomics started this how come it did not happen till the mid 90's and not 10 years earlier. This is the same arguement I here all the time. Regonomics had nothing to do with the economy of the 90's.
Here we go quoting the bible again. What ever happened to seperation of church and state.
Yes, I agree with you. Those whowill not work should not eat. But what about those who CANNOT work. What abouthealthcare. What about "IGive me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
I am tired of everyone making political judgements based on religious beliefs. I have no problem with you running your life based on a book written 2000 years ago but our free country should be run by a qualified individual and not someone who bases everything soley on religion. That is the foundation of this country. If you believe religion should control the masses then move to the Middle East.
And if you think letting a woman do to her body what her basic human rights allow her to is wrong then you support taking away the right to freedom and choice. If you take away freedom and choice, you take away the second amendment(you know the one we all on this forum are fighting for)
ORIGINAL: JagMagMan
Would that be the view that raises taxes?
Would that be the view that raises taxes?
Oh, yeah, the economic boom of the 90's! That would be the economic boom wave that "Reganomics" started!
yes the eonomic boom of the 90's--balanced budget,lower taxes,surpluss not deficit, and low fuel cost. We had none of these with your beloved "Reganomics". If reganomics started this how come it did not happen till the mid 90's and not 10 years earlier. This is the same arguement I here all the time. Regonomics had nothing to do with the economy of the 90's.
The bible says " Let those who WILL Not work, not eat!"
I AM "Union!" AND, the Republican Party IS NOT perfect! However, I CANNOT support a party that kills babies
I AM "Union!" AND, the Republican Party IS NOT perfect! However, I CANNOT support a party that kills babies
Here we go quoting the bible again. What ever happened to seperation of church and state.
Yes, I agree with you. Those whowill not work should not eat. But what about those who CANNOT work. What abouthealthcare. What about "IGive me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
I am tired of everyone making political judgements based on religious beliefs. I have no problem with you running your life based on a book written 2000 years ago but our free country should be run by a qualified individual and not someone who bases everything soley on religion. That is the foundation of this country. If you believe religion should control the masses then move to the Middle East.
And if you think letting a woman do to her body what her basic human rights allow her to is wrong then you support taking away the right to freedom and choice. If you take away freedom and choice, you take away the second amendment(you know the one we all on this forum are fighting for)
Clinton's admin wasnt that strong either....Its easy to coattail after the wake of the best president this country has ever had, not to mention Clinton drained programs such as the Army to cut national spending.
Your statement is bold irks me though. Ifanticide is a whole nother topic than abortion, assuming you are pro choice on abortion. Infanticide, which Obama supported at one point, involves killing babies who are already born from a failed abortion. 7 month babies can easily make it with todays tech, yet it is LEGAL to leave them to die when born.
Move to the middle east real cute.....This country was based on religious views and foundations....Hell its in our documents and even on our money. If you cant accept that, maybe it is you who should start packing pal.
I honestly dont know where some of these trains of thoughts even originate......I fear it is fixin to be sad times ahead for this beloved country.
#56
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
Well there is no doubt McCain has my vote BUT the reason certainly isn't focused on a single issue.
I think Bush has hurt this country financially, internationally, our pride, our world standings in education, health, and billions and billions thrown right to KBR/Halliburton Cheney cronies. No -- we have more issues than guns gents and votingfor a candidateon asingle issue contingent is just Un-American. Just what good has Bush's hand-holding friendships with the Saudi's done for this country ?
McCain has 73 lobbyists in his employ for his presidential campaign. Hey. I'm just a small guy running my own business, but when McCain's top 3 campaign workers work directly for the b*sturds that just about tipped us over and still may, I see "other issues" that ALSOneed our attention.
My father was in the Battan Death March and I was raised to believe that only very "Bad Guys" use torture, as have 90 % of the rest of the world, and they too have given patriots blood for freedom. I am left with few answers and many questions.
---- Roberoo
[/align]
#57
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,203
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
The economy during the 90's was thanks to Reagan? Don't think so. It had to do with the president in office at the time. Just like what we see now is a product of the Bush administration.
This gun thing is silly, really. So a democrat is saying what typical democrats say. They push for more gun control than their republican opponent. Give me a break, guns are NEVER going away. We will always have our guns and I don't care who gets in office, the guns are here to stay.
Yes, if the economy doesn't get back on track, a bunch of guns in your gun closet aren't going to take precedence over other issues i.e. being able to work, others being able to work, businesses doing well so spending is up and the economy is strong.
I'm not worried about it. Obama will win and this country will get back on track. Can't wait.
This gun thing is silly, really. So a democrat is saying what typical democrats say. They push for more gun control than their republican opponent. Give me a break, guns are NEVER going away. We will always have our guns and I don't care who gets in office, the guns are here to stay.
Yes, if the economy doesn't get back on track, a bunch of guns in your gun closet aren't going to take precedence over other issues i.e. being able to work, others being able to work, businesses doing well so spending is up and the economy is strong.
I'm not worried about it. Obama will win and this country will get back on track. Can't wait.
#59
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
You pro Obama guys screaming for improved economics need to seethe link I posted on page 3.....he and his cronies are a big reason we are in the crapper.....DO SOME RESEARCH....PLEASE!!!
#60
RE: NRA - Obama Ad
Damn Dems are a socialist bunch.....the most liberal Senator in the nation and some folks want to elect him President of The United States. Europe and our enemies love him for a reason.