Community
Whitetail Deer Hunting Gain a better understanding of the World's most popular big game animal and the techniques that will help you become a better deer hunter.

Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-13-2005, 03:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Jim Malone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 37
Default Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

I have a (probably) stupid question, but when comparing the knockdown power of a broadhead arrow and a .410 slug the slug seem to outclass the broadhead.
Now , i know the broadhead causes bleeding while the .410 causes shock, but in the SAME situation, same range, same shot placement wouldn't a .410 cause the same damage as a broadhead?
This is a purely hypothetical question.
I know the broadhead works as a cutting implement ( larger wound profile) when inside the animal but once it excited the animal is it about the same effect as a .410 slug?
Jim Malone is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:40 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

but in the SAME situation, same range, same shot placement wouldn't a .410 cause the same damage as a broadhead?
Nope. The broadhead kills by causing hemmoraging and internal blood loss, the 410 slug doesn't. While in a perfect scenario the 410 slug could kill a deer it surely wouldn't cause enough blood loss to be a quick kill (unless a major artery was hit).
Bionicrooster is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:15 AM
  #3  
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,545
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?


ORIGINAL: Bionicrooster

but in the SAME situation, same range, same shot placement wouldn't a .410 cause the same damage as a broadhead?
Nope. The broadhead kills by causing hemmoraging and internal blood loss, the 410 slug doesn't. While in a perfect scenario the 410 slug could kill a deer it surely wouldn't cause enough blood loss to be a quick kill (unless a major artery was hit).
While I think the .410 is an inadequate deer round , it most certainly does cause enough internal bleeding to kill a deer . If you don't believe it try standing in front of one , once it drills a hole in both of your lungs your opinion will change . Shot placement is what really does the job regardless of what causes the damage , stick an arrow or a bullet improperly and neither will work .
kevin1 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:22 AM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

Kevin you will notice I said Quick kill. Shoot a deer with a 410 through the lungs and see how far he runs and what kind of blood trail you have.
Bionicrooster is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:33 AM
  #5  
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,545
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

The last one I saw shot with a .410 ran 50 yards , she took a round through both lungs and the heart on a quartering away shot . How quick do you want it ? Average run after the shot for archery equipment is about the same , the two weapons just achieve the goal differently . Shot placement is still far more important than method .
kevin1 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:04 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

Kev, we can go back and forth all day long, you honestly believe the 410 causes the same kind of hemmorage and blood loss as a broadhead? Honestly? You said you hit it in both lungs and the heart, I guess she did go down quick. Lets stick to the example I gave of just hitting the lungs? Does the 410 cause enough damage to the lungs to collapse them instantly like a broadhead? Will the deer drop in 50 yards if the heart and all major arteries are missed? Of course a 410 will kill a deer if the proper shot is taken, the question was would it cause the same damage as a broadhead. The answer is no. The broadhead causes faster and more sever blood loss.

Plus you say you don't believe its an adequate deer weapon, then go on to talk about the "last one you shot" with it..... Thats interesting.....
Bionicrooster is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 06:26 AM
  #7  
 
Hotburn76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Findlay, Ohio
Posts: 3,286
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

I believe the .410 is big enough and in the state of ohio the DNR thinks so too because it is alowable hunting equipment. The .410 has a muzzle velocity of 1830 fps but only 650 pounds of energy. At work a guy took his 10 year old son out and he took a fifty yard quartering to shot and blew out the shoulder and hit the heart. I think it is an effective gun I just wouldn't shoot it past say sixty yards. .410 is bigger than most centerfires and im sure some of those guys that take 200+ yards shots have missed the shoulder and only hit lungs with success. Like i said though good, just not good and far.
Hotburn76 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 06:52 AM
  #8  
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,545
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

Bionicrooster , I didn't shoot her since I won't use a .410 for anything bigger than training kids on squirrels , I was observing while someone else shot her , ironically in an attempt to convince me that the .410 was ok for deer . Reread my post .
ORIGINAL: kevin1
The last one I saw shot with a .410 ran 50 yards
Yes , a broadhead may cause greater blood loss initially , but the slug can balance that out with tissue damage and shock , both will fill the lungs with blood . Yes , put a bullet in a lung and it will collapse , ask any emergency room tech . Nobody can guarantee a drop withing 50 yards with any weapon , there are too many variables . Short of a head shot anyway .
kevin1 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 06:58 AM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
rybohunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,208
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

Apples to oranges.
rybohunter is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 09:10 AM
  #10  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Livonia,new york
Posts: 564
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

i don't see why some of you don't see the .410 as a good round. my buddy has taken several doe with his .410. in reality they have ran just as far as the ones hit with my 12 gage. yes placement is key, but if you hit a deer in the thoracic cavity with a .410 i would bet my left testicle it would bring the deer down within 100 yards easy.
jimmy the foot is offline  


Quick Reply: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.