HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?
View Single Post
Old 12-13-2005 | 06:52 AM
  #8  
kevin1's Avatar
kevin1
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 22,545
Likes: 0
From: Ramsey , Indiana
Default RE: Broadheads ok, .410 not ok?

Bionicrooster , I didn't shoot her since I won't use a .410 for anything bigger than training kids on squirrels , I was observing while someone else shot her , ironically in an attempt to convince me that the .410 was ok for deer . Reread my post .
ORIGINAL: kevin1
The last one I saw shot with a .410 ran 50 yards
Yes , a broadhead may cause greater blood loss initially , but the slug can balance that out with tissue damage and shock , both will fill the lungs with blood . Yes , put a bullet in a lung and it will collapse , ask any emergency room tech . Nobody can guarantee a drop withing 50 yards with any weapon , there are too many variables . Short of a head shot anyway .
kevin1 is offline  
Reply