zmschillin

I want to get a couple moultire cameras this summer and I would like to know what all of you think about each of these. Gamespy 100 1.3, Gamespy 100 2.1, and the Gamespy 200, 3.1. I know the 200 is probably a better camera but I am wanting to get 2 or 3 of them and the 100's are a good bit cheeper. And if you all have had good luck with the 100'si will just get them.

Cannonball

I have heard rumors that the new moultries are going to be a great bang for the buck, but I will have to see it for myself. The moultrie cams that I have experience with are good to get you going with. If you are going to turn it into a small hobby then you will probably move onto something better. But you have to start somewhere and those will work for ya for the time being.

TexasOaks

We have 4 of the 1.3 Moultries and one Cudde Back. Moultries are pretty good for the cost if you get a solar panel, rechargeable battery and have them placed under a feeder. Check my posts under these forum for examples of what the pictures look like; If they don't say Cudde Back on them they are a Moultrie camera picture.

The trigger speed is not fast at all on the Moultries so they cant be used on trails.You need the deer to stop to get a pictures of them. My recommendation is to wait for the new cameras coming out this summer. Moultrie is coming out with some new ones as well as other brands.

TexasOaks

1.3 Moultrie Camera Pics:

mjreck21

I like the quality pics my gamespy 200 puts out, but the only thing is the late reaction time of the camera. I would recommend it for a food plot and not a trail. If you put it on a trail you would probably get a lot of butt pictures.

TROPHYHUNTER25

out of 4 i have problembs with 2