![]() |
moultire cameras
I want to get a couple moultire cameras this summer and I would like to know what all of you think about each of these. Gamespy 100 1.3, Gamespy 100 2.1, and the Gamespy 200, 3.1. I know the 200 is probably a better camera but I am wanting to get 2 or 3 of them and the 100's are a good bit cheeper. And if you all have had good luck with the 100'si will just get them.
|
RE: moultire cameras
I have heard rumors that the new moultries are going to be a great bang for the buck, but I will have to see it for myself. The moultrie cams that I have experience with are good to get you going with. If you are going to turn it into a small hobby then you will probably move onto something better. But you have to start somewhere and those will work for ya for the time being.
|
RE: moultire cameras
We have 4 of the 1.3 Moultries and one Cudde Back. Moultries are pretty good for the cost if you get a solar panel, rechargeable battery and have them placed under a feeder. Check my posts under these forum for examples of what the pictures look like; If they don't say Cudde Back on them they are a Moultrie camera picture.
The trigger speed is not fast at all on the Moultries so they cant be used on trails.You need the deer to stop to get a pictures of them. My recommendation is to wait for the new cameras coming out this summer. Moultrie is coming out with some new ones as well as other brands. |
RE: moultire cameras
1.3 Moultrie Camera Pics:
|
RE: moultire cameras
I like the quality pics my gamespy 200 puts out, but the only thing is the late reaction time of the camera. I would recommend it for a food plot and not a trail. If you put it on a trail you would probably get a lot of butt pictures.
|
RE: moultire cameras
out of 4 i have problembs with 2
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.