Does This Sound Familiar
02-24-2009 | 05:56 AM
#31
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,167
Likes: 0
From: PA
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?
Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do.
02-24-2009 | 06:08 AM
#32
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?
Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do.
That is indeed the management style the PGC is currently using. Just because they don't use that name for it doesnt mean that's not the general mangement principle they're following. If you understood what thse terms meant you wouldnt be embarrasing yourself.
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
[blockquote]quote:
Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do. [/blockquote]
Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?
[/blockquote]
Do you get some sick satisfaction from intentionally misrepresenting what other people posts.
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
[blockquote]quote:
Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do. [/blockquote]
Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?
[/blockquote]
Do you get some sick satisfaction from intentionally misrepresenting what other people posts.
Jim, you should at least include a little salt and pepper when you stuff his own words back down his throat
02-24-2009 | 06:17 AM
#33
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
That is indeed the management style the PGC is currently using. Just because they don't use that name for it doesnt mean that's not the general management principle they're following. If you understood what thse terms meant you wouldnt be embarrasing yourself.
BTW, I just proved it is you that don't understand the terms. I have the report in front of me that lists the RDD definitions. Do you know how many RDD they list in that report and do you know what each RDD signifies?
02-24-2009 | 06:55 AM
#35
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
I guess that meanshe's not gonna tell us the proper setting for our secret decoder rings.
I guess that meanshe's not gonna tell us the proper setting for our secret decoder rings.
02-24-2009 | 12:03 PM
#37
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
Which is what the response was directed toward. We all know that there has been a shift from one of Maximum sustained yeild to an RDD optimal sustained yeild. The terminology to justify both is similar but they are very different management styles
02-24-2009 | 01:09 PM
#38
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
bb every thing is the same same square mile same amount of forrestsame amount of devlopment same usable land same amount of the same trees same in every aspect
i think not that seems foolish
02-24-2009 | 01:27 PM
#39
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
WMU 2F is 7% farmland and 2G is 7.6%., 2F is 90.7% forested and 2G is 90%,2f is .8% developed and 2G is .6% developed . Herd health and forest health is rated the same in both WMUs, so I guess you better rethink your last post.
02-24-2009 | 01:33 PM
#40
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
RE: Does This Sound Familiar
and the sq miles of both units are the same and with your numbers they dont seem to be exactly the
same what about terrain when you answer post fully then maybe i will rethink last post
same what about terrain when you answer post fully then maybe i will rethink last post