Deer densities are reported interms of DPSM so the size of the two units is irrelevant. The PGC rates the terrain as being the same and that is why both units have "2" as a prefix.

so you are saying everything is the exactly thesame exept the deer numbers

OF course I am not saying everything is exactly the same. For example 2G has a regeneration rate of 42% while 2F 's rate is only 36%.

But what I am saying is there is no difference in criteria between the two units , that would justify having almost twice as many DPSM in 2F as in 2G.

So, I see you can't handle the truth. But ,I am not surprised, since you have demonstrated you know very little about 2f or 2G and deer management in general.

2f has more deer less regeneration seems to me that says something
you are right i knowlittle of any of the 2's or deer managment i leave it to the pros that went to
school for that stuff

You are correct, it says 2F has too many deer and the PGC refuses to reduce the herd like they did in 2G. I ask Dr. Rosenberry about that and he didn't have an answer.

The only thing BB knows about 2G and 2F is what he reads. He has no practical experience with either WMU

Wrong again sport. i hunted 2g for several years. You have no problem stating that Ars are producing bigger deer even though you have no facts to support that claim. You have no idea what the effects of ARs might be in 5C , 5b, 3c ,3D or any other WMU yet you profess to know ARs are creating bigger buck.

We hear yo BB, loud and clear.