ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do.
Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?
Wrong again sport!
That is indeed the management style the PGC is currently using. Just because they don't use that name for it doesnt mean that's not the general mangement principle they're following. If you understood what thse terms meant you wouldnt be embarrasing yourself.
[blockquote]
quote:
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
[blockquote]
quote:
Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do. [/blockquote]
Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?
[/blockquote]
Do you get some sick satisfaction from intentionally misrepresenting what other people posts.
LOL !!!
Jim, you should at least include a little salt and pepper when you stuff his own words back down his throat
