Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.308 or .270?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-25-2007 | 06:08 PM
  #61  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Default RE: .308 or .270?

The 270 because the balistic coefficient is better and if you're even thinking of getting a 308 then you might as well get the 30-06 in my opinion.
M77man is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-2007 | 09:12 PM
  #62  
EKM
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Denver, Colorado
Default RE: .308 or .270?

"....if you're even thinking of getting a 308 then you might as well get the 30-06 in my opinion."
For hunting game more robust than deer I wholeheartedly agree....
Deer size critters and underand for target shooting, the .308 is a wonderful cartridge.
================================================== ==

From a prior note:

ORIGINAL: EKM

After six pages of debate/discussionregarding 270 vs. 308 andthe whole works may be tossed aside for a 30-30?

What was the point in the first place?
Something isn't right.



I don't see what is not right. The original poster came here looking for information, which he received, and based on that information has decided to look at other options that may or may not suit his needs just as well. To my way of thinking, this is what it is all about, sharing info and experiences with fellow hunters and shooters.

Kinda like going to a pet shop to buy a puppy, just gotta choose between a golden retriever and a golden lab.... then end up going home with a pet turtle instead.

EKM is offline  
Reply
Old 08-26-2007 | 09:48 AM
  #63  
younggun308's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default RE: .308 or .270?

ORIGINAL: EKM


Kinda like going to a pet shop to buy a puppy, just gotta choose between a golden retriever and a golden lab.... then end up going home with a pet turtle instead.
LOL, good analogy, EKM.
younggun308 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-2007 | 10:56 PM
  #64  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: COLUMBUS,INDIANA
Default RE: .308 or .270?

BOTH CALIBERS ARE GOOD,THEY BOTH ARE DEPENDABLE BUT FOR LONGER DISTANCES TAKE THE 308.
mathews outback is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-2007 | 11:08 PM
  #65  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: Bossier City LA United States
Default RE: .308 or .270?

BUT FOR LONGER DISTANCES TAKE THE 308.
I am really curious why you would say take a 308 Win over a 270 Win for longer distances. The 270 is going to be flatter and carry more energy than a 308 with common loadings.
frizzellr is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 09:47 AM
  #66  
younggun308's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default RE: .308 or .270?

Few deer hunters shoot long distances, unless, of course, being out West, but there's a reason that snipers use the .308 and not the .270, don't know what it is, but I trust their judgement.
younggun308 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 10:41 AM
  #67  
ipscshooter's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,352
Likes: 5
From: The Republic of Texas
Default RE: .308 or .270?

ORIGINAL: younggun308

Few deer hunters shoot long distances, unless, of course, being out West, but there's a reason that snipers use the .308 and not the .270, don't know what it is, but I trust their judgement.
This is just a guess, but, I'd bet the choice was made based on logistics, not ballistics. The .308 has been a standard military round since the '50's. The .270 has not. Sniper rifles of the past have pretty much been GI rifles with a scope mounted. I doubt that the snipers had much of a choice. I don't know whether this is still the case, or whether snipers might now be given more leeway in their cartridge choice.
ipscshooter is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 10:46 AM
  #68  
ipscshooter's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,352
Likes: 5
From: The Republic of Texas
Default RE: .308 or .270?

ORIGINAL: M77man

The 270 because the balistic coefficient is better
That kinda depends on which bullet weight/bullet designyou're using for each cartridge, doesn't it? Just a guess, but, wouldn't a 165 gr. boattail .308 have a better ballistic coefficient than a 150 gr. soft point .277?
ipscshooter is offline  
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 10:21 AM
  #69  
younggun308's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default RE: .308 or .270?

But all those "tactical" bolt-actions are in .308, and consumers have a choice.

I wonder if Wikipedia knows, I doubt it.
younggun308 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 10:53 AM
  #70  
ipscshooter's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,352
Likes: 5
From: The Republic of Texas
Default RE: .308 or .270?

ORIGINAL: younggun308

But all those "tactical" bolt-actions are in .308, and consumers have a choice.

I wonder if Wikipedia knows, I doubt it.
Yes, but I suspect that consumers buy .308 tactical rifles because "that's what the Marine snipers use..." I doubt that it's because the .308 is someohw ballistically superior to all other potential "sniper" rounds. So, it comesback to military logistics.

Maybe one of our military trained guys can chime in here... kdvollmer??? Do military "snipers" have a choice now as to what rifle/scope/cartridge combo they use? Have they always had a choice?
ipscshooter is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.