Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 .243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458 >

.243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-07-2007, 12:44 PM
  #41  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 12,040
Default RE: .243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

ORIGINAL: HEAD0001

Probably too far for a 243, but I bet a thirty caliber could get there. Boy I am gonna get it for that one.Tom.
Man, them's fightin' words.

Obviously it depends on which "thirty caliber" you're talking about.
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 10:21 PM
  #42  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 194
Default RE: .243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

ORIGINAL: James B

Another Rabid 7mm-08 fan here.. I am a fan of the 308 case and most of the cartridges based on it. One casing for NA. 243 for varmints, 260 for deer and antelope, 7mm-08 for deer and mid range elk, 308 for about everything, 338 Federal for elk and moose. Ditto the 358 Win The two latter ones will do for bears as well.
This is indeed the only way to compare calibers, keep everything else as consistant as possible, like using the 08 casing. All this tells you is bigger game bodies require bigger bullets.

Where's the 375-08 for Cape Buffalo?
Whitehorn is offline  
Old 02-08-2007, 09:13 AM
  #43  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: .243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

You can neck it to 375. Some have tried necking it to 40 caliber. However at this point there is not enough shoulder to headspace. Of course these bigger bullets would eat up the powder capacity. Gotta go to the 45-70 for Cape Buffalo and T-Rex.. I could try the 405 Wichester for these big guys. Teddy R. loved the 405 in the 95 Lever action rifle and took all the African species with it. Of course now-a-days its much to small for these critters.
James B is offline  
Old 02-08-2007, 10:12 PM
  #44  
 
triggerhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Augusta KS USA
Posts: 206
Default RE: .243 vs .vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

The most important question would be to ask the deer that were killed with each of these calibers to find out which one is more dead.

Really there are so many great cartridges and bullets you can combine with these calibers and each a tremendous in thier own rights.

You could go forever debating the strengths and weeknesses of each of these and all the variables for every application under the sun.
triggerhappy is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 03:38 PM
  #45  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: .243 vs .vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

Triggerhappy. You are right. Isn't it GREAT. Give us old duffers something to do.
James B is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 07:42 AM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 518
Default RE: .243 vs .vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

ORIGINAL: triggerhappy

The most important question would be to ask the deer that were killed with each of these calibers to find out which one is more dead.
Never looked at it that way????? I suppose I can draft up a survey and take it with me next time, I like your thinking! What caliber did you use to take your pronghorn with?
M77man is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 11:24 AM
  #47  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 208
Default RE: .243 vs .vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

I dont know what all the talk is about the 30-30??? IMHO its a dated round. Some of the slugs i shot thru my rifled 12ga. have better ballistics, retain more energy, and are just as fast, out to 150 yards! on top of that im sure they could be more accurate as well as i could shoot sub3.5" groups at 100yds. I would never buy a 30-30
ReDoT is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 11:36 AM
  #48  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 208
Default RE: .243 vs .vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

Also, people cant compare a round based upon howa deer dropped and then say "well my buddy shootsthis and the deer ran for 200yds". too many variables are there shot placement, bullet type. You must look at the facts.ballistics for the most part are fact. things to consider are trajectory,(how flat does it shoot) velocity, (whichcoresponds totrajectory) energy (relative to both velocity and bullet weight) and more important than muzzle energy is down range energy. I could shoot a deer in the head with a 22LR drop him dead @ 20 yds. does that make it a good deer rifle.......probably not. people tend to judge things based upon their experiences only and dismiss their own error too quickly
ReDoT is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:37 PM
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 97
Default RE: .243 vs .257 vs .277 vs .284 vs .308 vs .338 vs .458

hey shot davis what was the most common calibur they were using on that 375 yard shot. maybe people were over exagerateing the shot and heltd too high. what was the cal that nailed it first shot at the known range??
7MM.REMINGTON.MAGNUM is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.