Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
09-25-2008 | 11:03 AM
#41
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
Let me get this straight, so there's no other market for their crops? They can't sell them for anything other than baiting deer? Hmmm, given the big biofuel kick and the rising price of groceries because there's not enough food because of biofuel ...
And then there's the hunting economy already mentioned. And the health of the deer population tied to it. Emergency button? Hardly. The emergency measure would be to hire sharpshooters and implment new earn a buck rules to wipe out your deer population. They're doing this so it doesn't come to that.
And then there's the hunting economy already mentioned. And the health of the deer population tied to it. Emergency button? Hardly. The emergency measure would be to hire sharpshooters and implment new earn a buck rules to wipe out your deer population. They're doing this so it doesn't come to that.
09-25-2008 | 11:38 AM
#42
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
I do agree with the guy suing that state of Michigan. The disease hasn't been found in any wild deer yet and Michigan is hitting the emergency button. This guy should be furious and I would do the same thing. Any business is a gamble, but when your government screws you over then you have the right to be pissed. I hope everyone who planted Sugar Beets sues the state of Michigan until they have proof that CWD is in the deer herd.
[/quote]
right
09-25-2008 | 11:52 AM
#44
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
From: Memphis TN USA
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
Ok just to clarify, you guys hope the state gets sued for trying to protect the deer herd (by the way this is called being proactive as opposed to reactive -just throwing that in there in case you wanted to look up the definitions). Then you hope the farmer gets a big payout from the lawsuit that comes out of the pockets of the taxpayers instead of going into other more helpful programs making the economy even worse than it was before. Because now they don't have to money to fund those goverment supported assistance programs because they payed it all to 1 farmer because he decided to plant beets of his own valition. So now the farmers rich and the deer herd isjacked. Well fare and all of the other governement support programs are being shut down because they are under funded and are unable to handle to massive influx of umemployment claims that are being filed due to all of the mom and pop shops and other folks that depend on the deer season now being out of work, just so you guys can say"them DNR folks ain't got no business messn with our deer". Gotcha
09-25-2008 | 11:54 AM
#45
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: mid-michigan
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
ORIGINAL: silentassassin
Ok just to clarify, you guys hope the state gets sued for trying to protect the deer herd (by the way this is called being proactive as opposed to reactive -just throwing that in there in case you wanted to look up the definitions). Then you hope the farmer gets a big payout from the lawsuit that comes out of the pockets of the taxpayers instead of going into other more helpful programs making the economy even worse than it was before. Because now they don't have to money to fund those goverment supported assistance programs because they payed it all to 1 farmer because he decided to plant beets of his own valition. So now the farmers rich and the deer herd isjacked. Well fare and all of the other governement support programs are being shut down because they are under funded and are unable to handle to massive influx of umemployment claims that are being filed due to all of the mom and pop shops and other folks that depend on the deer season now being out of work, just so you guys can say"them DNR folks ain't got no business messn with our deer". Gotcha
Ok just to clarify, you guys hope the state gets sued for trying to protect the deer herd (by the way this is called being proactive as opposed to reactive -just throwing that in there in case you wanted to look up the definitions). Then you hope the farmer gets a big payout from the lawsuit that comes out of the pockets of the taxpayers instead of going into other more helpful programs making the economy even worse than it was before. Because now they don't have to money to fund those goverment supported assistance programs because they payed it all to 1 farmer because he decided to plant beets of his own valition. So now the farmers rich and the deer herd isjacked. Well fare and all of the other governement support programs are being shut down because they are under funded and are unable to handle to massive influx of umemployment claims that are being filed due to all of the mom and pop shops and other folks that depend on the deer season now being out of work, just so you guys can say"them DNR folks ain't got no business messn with our deer". Gotcha
could not said it better my self! seems like this case should be closed!
09-25-2008 | 12:17 PM
#46
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: West MI
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
ORIGINAL: silentassassin
Ok just to clarify, you guys hope the state gets sued for trying to protect the deer herd (by the way this is called being proactive as opposed to reactive -just throwing that in there in case you wanted to look up the definitions). Then you hope the farmer gets a big payout from the lawsuit that comes out of the pockets of the taxpayers instead of going into other more helpful programs making the economy even worse than it was before. Because now they don't have to money to fund those goverment supported assistance programs because they payed it all to 1 farmer because he decided to plant beets of his own valition. So now the farmers rich and the deer herd isjacked. Well fare and all of the other governement support programs are being shut down because they are under funded and are unable to handle to massive influx of umemployment claims that are being filed due to all of the mom and pop shops and other folks that depend on the deer season now being out of work, just so you guys can say"them DNR folks ain't got no business messn with our deer". Gotcha
Ok just to clarify, you guys hope the state gets sued for trying to protect the deer herd (by the way this is called being proactive as opposed to reactive -just throwing that in there in case you wanted to look up the definitions). Then you hope the farmer gets a big payout from the lawsuit that comes out of the pockets of the taxpayers instead of going into other more helpful programs making the economy even worse than it was before. Because now they don't have to money to fund those goverment supported assistance programs because they payed it all to 1 farmer because he decided to plant beets of his own valition. So now the farmers rich and the deer herd isjacked. Well fare and all of the other governement support programs are being shut down because they are under funded and are unable to handle to massive influx of umemployment claims that are being filed due to all of the mom and pop shops and other folks that depend on the deer season now being out of work, just so you guys can say"them DNR folks ain't got no business messn with our deer". Gotcha
09-25-2008 | 12:22 PM
#47
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: mid-michigan
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
the farmer will adapt and over come to the economy as they did before how much of the crop is actually sold for deer feed only!?!? give me a percentage there. there is no way a farme say oh im going to plant all this for deer feed..i dont think so.
09-25-2008 | 01:25 PM
#49
Dominant Buck
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Michigan man sues DNR for recent bait ban
Food plots are naturally occurring foods
You think there isn't a push on right now in MI to plant some of these "naturally occurring" foods?
Only thing "natural" is that it grows from the ground. Why was it planted?