ORIGINAL: silentassassin
Ok just to clarify, you guys hope the state gets sued for trying to protect the deer herd (by the way this is called being proactive as opposed to reactive -just throwing that in there in case you wanted to look up the definitions). Then you hope the farmer gets a big payout from the lawsuit that comes out of the pockets of the taxpayers instead of going into other more helpful programs making the economy even worse than it was before. Because now they don't have to money to fund those goverment supported assistance programs because they payed it all to 1 farmer because he decided to plant beets of his own valition. So now the farmers rich and the deer herd isjacked. Well fare and all of the other governement support programs are being shut down because they are under funded and are unable to handle to massive influx of umemployment claims that are being filed due to all of the mom and pop shops and other folks that depend on the deer season now being out of work, just so you guys can say"them DNR folks ain't got no business messn with our deer". Gotcha
could not said it better my self! seems like this case should be closed!