Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.
View Poll Results: A poll
1. I would Shoot 2. Get the deer
35.43%
1. I wouldn't shoot 2. Get the deer
56.57%
1. I wouldn't shoot 2. I'd leave the deer
8.00%
Voters: 175. You may not vote on this poll

Situation Ethics????........2 Part Question .....**UPDATED WITH twils real life situation

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-27-2008 | 12:22 PM
  #241  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 0
From: Moravia NY USA
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

Actually, the second situation is not tresspassing. A hunter has the legal right to recover their game. The landowner has no legal right to prevent them from doing that...call the cops, I will wait. haha.
You have obviously not read much of the thread.
Depends on your state laws - no right to recover without permission in NY.
Landowner has the legal right to deny access - even with a CO.
I have done so because of prior abuse by some hunting our borders.
Most have permission but there are some that will be sited if they trspass for any reason.

Steve

SteveBNy is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 12:40 PM
  #242  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

ORIGINAL: SteveBNy

Actually, the second situation is not tresspassing. A hunter has the legal right to recover their game. The landowner has no legal right to prevent them from doing that...call the cops, I will wait. haha.
You have obviously not read much of the thread.
Depends on your state laws - no right to recover without permission in NY.
Landowner has the legal right to deny access - even with a CO.
I have done so because of prior abuse by some hunting our borders.
Most have permission but there are some that will be sited if they trspass for any reason.

Steve
I guess this is where I get mixed up w/ this thread. I thought it was "Ethics" of the situation, not "Legality" of the situation. I'm also a little confused about why it's either trespess, or rot for the deer? As I stated, why can't you go try to smooth over the issues with the land owner and CO, and if you can't, at least assist them in recovering the deer that you shot, so it doesn't go to waste. If you at least ask, it would go along way toward easing the tension later down the line, and maybe even becoming friends. I surly wouldn't go there and challenge the merits of his case, or even argue the merits of fair chase. I would however, enlighten them on your true concern for your "ethics" of recovering the deer by either party, so it doesn't go to waste. "Ethics."
Goodgrief is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 12:59 PM
  #243  
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,199
Likes: 1
From: Blossvale, New York
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

I guess I'm the only one that changed his mind. In the beginning of this thread I thought that.... ahhhhhhh..... errrrr... ahhhhhh... Nevermind.
davidmil is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 01:41 PM
  #244  
PreacherTony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

ORIGINAL: LittleChief
................but I remember a time and a place where you could count on a total stranger to render assistance to someone in need. People waved "hello" to total strangers they met on the highway. I joined the Navy in 1981 when I was 17. Now, I've seen more of the world than I haven't seen, and I've never seen anything to change my feelings thatwe, as Americans, are the luckiest people in the world. We have rights and freedoms that people in so many other countries can't begin to fathom, and so many Americans take them for granted,take advantage of them or just generally spit on them.
You nailed it in this part of your post, LC.

People's rights have KILLED MILLIONS of babies too .......


PreacherTony is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 01:59 PM
  #245  
gplant's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Mich
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

ORIGINAL: MN/Kyle

23 pages of debate, who has changed their minds, really curious.
Not me. I voted no,yes. Im going after my deer.As far as I see it I took that deers life and I'll be damned if It was for nothing!!!! Let a deer die for nothing or Tresspass to get it. What sounds more Ethical?
gplant is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 02:52 PM
  #246  
tsoc's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

What I have come to realize as a result of this discussion is because I may choose to recover a deer on posted property at significant distances from anyone's residence or buildings it is effectively the same as me entering their home without permission.In a million years I would have never thought that the two things were considered in the same manner.So being the heathen that I apparently am I will now begin to enter peoples homes at will to quench my thirst or to make a sandwich use the bathroom what ever my needs dictate.(NOT)
My sense of ethics are such that when I squeeze the release while shooting an arrow or pull the trigger while firing a rifle I will not rest until I have recovered the animal that I have shot or determined that I havn't hit it lethally.
I have never had to trespass to recover an animal,I have neverset up near another hunters property line.My sense and hope of human nature is that anybody whose property I haveentered or crossed to trail and recover a wounded animal would respect my diligence to do what I believe to be right and respect that I either didn't want the animal to suffer unnecessarily or that I wanted to make use of the animal versus leaving it to the predators.
I understand the points made by Big John,Bawana Jim.SteveB etc..If I had hunters who were hunting my land when told not to,or were poaching on my property they would get no consideration from me.But for the guy or gal who entered my property to recover an animal and who I had never had any difficulty with would get my consideration and help regardless of whether they had asked forpermission or not.Their sense of gratitude and courtesy would dictate what would happen in future situations.Any thing beyond this is not comprehensible personally to me!
I would be willing to take my chances offering explanation to a landowner and if need be a judge.

tsoc is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 03:23 PM
  #247  
BigJ71's Avatar
Site Bouncer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

ORIGINAL: BigJ71

Ok,

I've got a question for all of those who think it's ok to jump a fence and grab your deer even though the property is posted and you know full well the owner doesn't want you on the property..........how far is too far? I really want to know. Where do YOU draw the line? If 3 feet is ok then how about 10 yards? Where isthe point when you say "I shouldn't go there"? I really want to know.

To me if your willing to go 3 yards then you might as well go all the way into the property. Do you believe the last 3 feet, 10 yards (or whatever your threshold is) of a persons property is less theirs because it just happens to butt up against the property you can be on?

I really want to know where you guys draw the line and how you justify that part of the property less important or less privatethan the parts you won't go..........enlighten me.

I asked a SIMPLE question and only ONE person answered it.(Thanks TEmbry BTW)

All you fence jumpers, I want to know how far is too far and why? It's a simple question(s)really..........I'm waiting.


BigJ71 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 03:26 PM
  #248  
Germ's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

ORIGINAL: BigJ71

ORIGINAL: BigJ71

Ok,

I've got a question for all of those who think it's ok to jump a fence and grab your deer even though the property is posted and you know full well the owner doesn't want you on the property..........how far is too far? I really want to know. Where do YOU draw the line? If 3 feet is ok then how about 10 yards? Where isthe point when you say "I shouldn't go there"? I really want to know.

To me if your willing to go 3 yards then you might as well go all the way into the property. Do you believe the last 3 feet, 10 yards (or whatever your threshold is) of a persons property is less theirs because it just happens to butt up against the property you can be on?

I really want to know where you guys draw the line and how you justify that part of the property less important or less privatethan the parts you won't go..........enlighten me.

I asked a SIMPLE question and only ONE person answered it.(Thanks TEmbry BTW)

All you fence jumpers, I want to know how far is too far and why? It's a simple question(s)really..........I'm waiting.
I stated it early on, but since than I have change my mind.

It was if I can see it, if not it's a loss


Germ is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 03:30 PM
  #249  
Lanse couche couche's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,277
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Ohio
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

Kind of like asking someone how far it would be acceptable for their kid to chase their soccer ball into the neighborhood grouches yard. [8D]
Lanse couche couche is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2008 | 03:36 PM
  #250  
tsoc's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
Default RE: Ok Ethics Police ........2 Part Question .................................................

Saying this respectfully to the man who likely out weighs me by 100 plus pounds,what part of"I will not rest"is not clear?

tsoc is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.