Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Elite vs Bowtech court ruling

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-25-2006 | 08:13 AM
  #21  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: Bradford, Ontario
Default RE: Elite vs Bowtech court ruling

Gibblett,
Well we disagree here. If a judge tells a company they can only sell the existing product untill August 31st and then must market a new line and then puts a bunch of "appearance" type conditions on the new product then I wouldn't expect a new line too soon from elite. If they can pull a new design out of a hat then they would have anticipated this ruling and were prepared for it. If I was Elite I would appeal this as the conditions are so far reaching ( even limb angle + or - 3 degrees ) alot bows look alike and probably are violating this judge's ruling. I wonder if it will stand on appeal. But, that could take a long time and money spent on lawyers and not R&D or inventory. Hey I think they had a great bow and would likely have bought one after the company had put down some roots and could honour its warranties, but even though I'm not a lawyer I am in business and understand what is involved in creating new lines and getting them to market and that ruling is a major body blow.
TerryM is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2006 | 08:19 AM
  #22  
mobow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,082
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Elite vs Bowtech court ruling

My guess is.....if Kevin can can design the Bowtech line.....I am most certain he is capable of designing another. I'm in agreement that this sounds bad, but again, until I hear something "Official", which doesn't include a post on an archery forum, by the way, I'm just gonna wait and see what happens. Does sound pretty bad though.
mobow is offline  
Reply
Old 06-26-2006 | 04:44 AM
  #23  
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
From: .. NH USA
Default RE: Elite vs Bowtech court ruling

This is not a bad thing for Elite, this is a good thing IMO. They basicallygot offwith only a slight slap on the wrist. (just like BT did with the PSE ruling.)

1) They won the non-compete outright. This means that they do not have to pay the big bucks to BT coming out of the blocks, IMOthe killing stroke thatBT was looking for.

2) Key word in the rest of it is "appearance". Appearance can be changed (and defended in court) as subtly as by changing color, cutouts in the riser, rounding of a cam lobe or changing cutout structures in the cams, installing a e-suppressor at the factory to go out with every bow, etc. They should IMHOchange the ATA and brace to get away from any closeresemblance to the BT's, but that is a very minor change too-- all they have to do is run the limb pocket angle oh, say about what, 3.5- 4 degrees different? [8D]

I think that is why they (Elite)are so happy. They can continue on with little trouble from the looks, withfar less hasslethan what they originally thought anyway. Appeals are a naturalpart of the court system, and I'm sure some have already been filed. Personally I think this is all going to go away within a few months(or years)and both companies will continue on pretty much as they are. We'll just have to wait and see.
Pinwheel 12 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
peakrut
Whitetail Deer Hunting
7
06-29-2008 11:27 AM
Zim
South
2
08-22-2004 02:55 PM
Zim
Midwest
5
08-20-2004 08:36 PM
Zim
Northeast
2
08-20-2004 02:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.