Trail Cams
#12
RE: Trail Cams
Save your money and go digital. No sense in even messng with 35mm anymore. It smells and the cameras make noise that can spook the deer when the film advances. Here's my thought on the matter in another post.
http://http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=1347990
Also, my opinion on the Cuddeback is this:
I have a Cuddeback 3MP and IMO the Moultrie GameSpy200 is a much better buy. The Cuddeback does have a fast trigger speed but that is the ONLY advantage I can see that it has over the Moultrie. IMO it's not worth the extra $250.
http://http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=1347990
Also, my opinion on the Cuddeback is this:
I have a Cuddeback 3MP and IMO the Moultrie GameSpy200 is a much better buy. The Cuddeback does have a fast trigger speed but that is the ONLY advantage I can see that it has over the Moultrie. IMO it's not worth the extra $250.
#13
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 947
RE: Trail Cams
I have an older Non-typical DC-100 and it works great. I also have a Leaf River digital and I have to set it up on a corn pile to get pictures. The digital is definately cheaper in the long run but trigger speed is a disadvantge