smooth bore slugs
#2
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Gleason, TN
I've taken several does with rifled slugs and one spike buck. All have been clean, and I'd still be using that gun if I didn't have anything else.
As far as the rifles you mentioned, all are good, but if you can handle the .270, I'd go with that.
As far as the rifles you mentioned, all are good, but if you can handle the .270, I'd go with that.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
My Mossberg 500 with smooth bore and rifle sights shoots rifled slugs well enough out to 75-100 yds. My eyes keep me at about 75 for max range. They do kill deer just fine though.
Of the rifle calibers you mention, I'd use the 30/30 if it is a lever and you hunt woods where most shots will be about 50 yds and you don't expect to shoot over 100. If we're talking all bolt actions, or you expect to shoot over 100 yds, then go with the 270. Other good calibers without much recoil are 7-'08 and260 Rem.
Of the rifle calibers you mention, I'd use the 30/30 if it is a lever and you hunt woods where most shots will be about 50 yds and you don't expect to shoot over 100. If we're talking all bolt actions, or you expect to shoot over 100 yds, then go with the 270. Other good calibers without much recoil are 7-'08 and260 Rem.
#6
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From:
There are several quality "rifled-slug" ammo out there. These are deadly on dere sized game and accurate in mostsmooth bores out to about 75-100 yards or so. Main problem some folks seem to have, me included, is managing the drop. It is rather dramatic because the friction of the air passing over the bullet's "rifling" , which is what causes the bullet to spin so that it remains on line,eats up energy that would other wise have been retained in the velocity of the bullet.(It is a Newtonian physics conservation of energy thing.) But with practice at the range, managing this isrelativley easy to learn.
Of the choices you mentioned - In this order: (1) 270 Win. (2) 243 Win. (3) 30/30 Win. Certainly all are adequate for deer sized game. From my expereince, the 130 gr. bullets is about optimum for the 270 Win., 100 gr. for the 243 Win., and 150 gr. for the 30/30 WIn. If you go with the 30/30 Win., be sure to try the new Hornady polymer tipped ammo developed for tube fed lever actions.It is substantially more expensive than most flat nose ammo, but there is a real gain in ballistic performance,i.e the arc is substantially reduced because the velocity is retained better .... it is flatter shooting.
Of the choices you mentioned - In this order: (1) 270 Win. (2) 243 Win. (3) 30/30 Win. Certainly all are adequate for deer sized game. From my expereince, the 130 gr. bullets is about optimum for the 270 Win., 100 gr. for the 243 Win., and 150 gr. for the 30/30 WIn. If you go with the 30/30 Win., be sure to try the new Hornady polymer tipped ammo developed for tube fed lever actions.It is substantially more expensive than most flat nose ammo, but there is a real gain in ballistic performance,i.e the arc is substantially reduced because the velocity is retained better .... it is flatter shooting.
#7
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
ORIGINAL: Mojotex
Main problem some folks seem to have, me included, is managing the drop. It is rather dramatic because the friction of the air passing over the bullet's "rifling" , which is what causes the bullet to spin so that it remains on line,eats up energy that would other wise have been retained in the velocity of the bullet.(It is a Newtonian physics conservation of energy thing.) But with practice at the range, managing this isrelativley easy to learn.
Main problem some folks seem to have, me included, is managing the drop. It is rather dramatic because the friction of the air passing over the bullet's "rifling" , which is what causes the bullet to spin so that it remains on line,eats up energy that would other wise have been retained in the velocity of the bullet.(It is a Newtonian physics conservation of energy thing.) But with practice at the range, managing this isrelativley easy to learn.
#8
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 0
From: Blissfield MI USA
.243 for me. If you can use a rifle I wouldn't even consider a rifled shotgun slug. They have poor ballistics and kick like a mule. The .243 will have very little recoil, flat shooting and usually very accurate. And very effective on deer sized game and varmints. The 270 is nice, but it won't do anything on a deer that a .243 won't other than have more recoil. Now if you are planning to shoot something larger I would look at a .270, .308 or 30-06.
I know a lot of people that swore by a 30-06 until they got a .243 for their wife or kid. After that the bigger gun just collected dust or got traded for another .243.
Don't over look the 7mm-08 or 25-06 either, both of those are great low recoil rounds as well, but you can get heavier bullets than you can with the .243.
Paul
I know a lot of people that swore by a 30-06 until they got a .243 for their wife or kid. After that the bigger gun just collected dust or got traded for another .243.
Don't over look the 7mm-08 or 25-06 either, both of those are great low recoil rounds as well, but you can get heavier bullets than you can with the .243.
Paul
#10
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
I routinely get 3" groups at 100 yards with my Ithaca 37 12ga shooting rifled slugs. You will have to test to see which one your gun likes best.
For the rifle if you are deer hunting I would go with the .243, plenty of energy for deer, light recoil, and accurate too.
For the rifle if you are deer hunting I would go with the .243, plenty of energy for deer, light recoil, and accurate too.




