Community
Whitetail Deer Hunting Gain a better understanding of the World's most popular big game animal and the techniques that will help you become a better deer hunter.

243 and deer

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-19-2006, 09:58 PM
  #51  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: 243 and deer

ORIGINAL: zrexpilot

ORIGINAL: Chantecler111

Ok, zrex, tell me, would you rather use, a .338 Win Mag, or a 7mm Mag, on a grizzly bear? Or do you even own a magnum caliber? If what you are saying is true, then, the faster 7mm mag, would surely blow a bigger hole in that bear right? Because it expands more due to higher velocity.

No thats not what I am saying, you have to compare expanded bullet diameters. A 338 is already starting off bigger in diameter than the 7mm. Fire both into an animal and recover bullets and measure expanded diameters, the .338 is going to leave a bigger hole and penetrate more with the heavier bullets. Compare a 7 mag to say a 7-08 at 500 yds, the mag will have the needed velocity for expansion, see what I am trying to say ?
Actually, for once, I do. And now that you mention that, I feel like an idiot for even owning a magnum.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 12-19-2006, 10:18 PM
  #52  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: 243 and deer

Magnums offer no more killing power per say at close ranges than its little brother and actually can cause problems at close ranges, the high velocities can cause bullets to blow up at close range, and lack penetration, so then you go to harder bullets and then you start blowing tiny holes in deer. A 30-06 can be better than a 300 mag at close range but vice versa at long range.
Magnums are intended for long range. But I doubt any deer will stop a 300 mag at close range, but get into bigger game and I bet you will see what I am talking about.
We took 2 huge hogs with my friends 300 at close range, the mag did not go through them, but I bet if we would have shot them at 150-200 yds it would have gone through.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 12-19-2006, 10:22 PM
  #53  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: 243 and deer

Zrex, I actually, for once, see that you are making a valid claim, and I actually see how dumb I am now for owning a few magnums, when a standard caliber would do just fine, with less recoil. I think the way I hunt game has just changed, I have seen the er of my ways, and I regret it, what good does that extra power do you? None at all, only bragging rights is about it, and really, that doesn't even matter. Zrex, thank you for pointing all this out to me, now, I have some soul searching to do.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 12-19-2006, 10:41 PM
  #54  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: 243 and deer

Bulletsexpansion is determined by its velocity. Here is a swift scirroco bonded, it maximum expansion is at 2700fps, what happens in a mag at say 3100fps at say 50 yds.


2700fps 2245fps 1730fps 1440fps
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 12-19-2006, 10:57 PM
  #55  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: 243 and deer

The bullet explodes, when it makes contact, moving at 3100 fps.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 12-20-2006, 06:37 AM
  #56  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 1,157
Default RE: 243 and deer

Most soft point bullets are designed to expand at or around 2700fps. That just seems to be a magic number.No matter the calibur it just is the right muzzel velocity. ie ---30-06 180 gr 2700fps / 250 savage 100 gr 2700fps
DANTHEHUNTER is offline  
Old 12-20-2006, 11:30 AM
  #57  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 353
Default RE: 243 and deer

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTER

Most soft point bullets are designed to expand at or around 2700fps. That just seems to be a magic number.No matter the calibur it just is the right muzzel velocity. ie ---30-06 180 gr 2700fps / 250 savage 100 gr 2700fps
Please understand, I'm not doubting you, but where ever did you find that data?

Ex. .30/06 180 gr., MUZZLE velocity 2700fps. Are we required to place the muzzle against the deer, or can we stand back a little?
keyshunter is offline  
Old 12-20-2006, 12:06 PM
  #58  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: 243 and deer

ORIGINAL: keyshunter

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTER

Most soft point bullets are designed to expand at or around 2700fps. That just seems to be a magic number.No matter the calibur it just is the right muzzel velocity. ie ---30-06 180 gr 2700fps / 250 savage 100 gr 2700fps
Please understand, I'm not doubting you, but where ever did you find that data?

Ex. .30/06 180 gr., MUZZLE velocity 2700fps. Are we required to place the muzzle against the deer, or can we stand back a little?
The pics I posted above were from a scirrocco bonded bullet, so I would say a soft point would be a bit less. But if you also notice it has good expansion at 2200fps as well, so this particulat bullet would be best between 22 and 2700 fps.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 12-20-2006, 12:53 PM
  #59  
 
MichaelT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas
Posts: 2,174
Default RE: 243 and deer

Chantecler111, I do not know that you necessarily have some soul searching to do, but more-over perhaps some new rifle ( s ) searching to do....LOL...

Good luck in your quest.

And what zrexpilot was saying is exactly what I came to understand years ago by studying ballistics tables and bullet expansion charts. My first rifle was a used 30-30.My first new rifle, about 16 years ago,was a .270. Then a 7mm-08 followed, then a .243, then a .308, then a 30-06, then a .243 ( yesterday ) . I just got my Ruger M77 Compact .243 Stainless / Laminate, and it is sooooo great.

I currently have all of these rifles, and I believe I can do anything I need or want to do with them. Magnums have never been a part of my vocabulary.

God bless

Oh - BTW - and if I ever feel the need to boost any of these rounds, I will shoot some Hornady light mag ammo. It will Add around 200 ft / lb of energy to your round.
MichaelT. is offline  
Old 12-20-2006, 01:07 PM
  #60  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: 243 and deer

ORIGINAL: MichaelT.

Chantecler111, I do not know that you necessarily have some soul searching to do, but more-over perhaps some new rifle ( s ) searching to do....LOL...

Good luck in your quest.

And what zrexpilot was saying is exactly what I came to understand years ago by studying ballistics tables and bullet expansion charts. My first rifle was a used 30-30.My first new rifle, about 16 years ago,was a .270. Then a 7mm-08 followed, then a .243, then a .308, then a 30-06, then a .243 ( yesterday ) . I just got my Ruger M77 Compact .243 Stainless / Laminate, and it is sooooo great.

I currently have all of these rifles, and I believe I can do anything I need or want to do with them. Magnums have never been a part of my vocabulary.

God bless

Oh - BTW - and if I ever feel the need to boost any of these rounds, I will shoot some Hornady light mag ammo. It will Add around 200 ft / lb of energy to your round.
Michael, when I say that zrex's post, had a profound affect on me, I'm not kidding, I finally see that magnums, really arn't all that great, they are hard to shoot good, as well, I have been considering trading a .300 Win Mag for a .280, that seems like a good idea all the time, and Michael, you know as good as I, that a .338 Win Mag just isn't necessary in Arkansas, I own one, BTW, and I'm going to trade it in as well, I definently have some rifle searching to do,LOL.
Chantecler111 is offline  


Quick Reply: 243 and deer


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.