.17hmr vs. 17. mach 2
#2
RE: .17hmr vs. 17. mach 2
The 17 HMR is a necked down 22 Magnum.
The 17 HM2 is a necked down 22 long rifle.
The 17 HMR would be good for crows and ground hogs
The 17 HM2 would be good for squirrels and rabbits
I would like to have both
I would say the 17 HMR has more walnuts
The 17 HM2 is a necked down 22 long rifle.
The 17 HMR would be good for crows and ground hogs
The 17 HM2 would be good for squirrels and rabbits
I would like to have both
i was wonderin which gun has the most nuts and what the price difference is
#5
RE: .17hmr vs. 17. mach 2
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've gathered from friends who have HMR's, you can pretty much consider anything out to 100yds to be on target. the rise and drop are so insignificant that it shouldn't make a different in whether or not the critter is dead. Also, from what I've been told, you might want to stick with the 20 grain hollow point HMR's over the ballistic tips... at least when it comes to fox and such.
#6
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 145
RE: .17hmr vs. 17. mach 2
Yes, i would agree with sticking to those hollowpoints for the fox and such. Don't use them on gopher sized animals, i find they just pass right through them like they were FMJ's. You are also correct with considering anything out to 100yrds on target, it drops something like 1" at 100yrds.
Also i think the mach 2 is rather stupid to get, ammo is $2 cheaper than the HMR for the same number of rounds but it doesn't have near the abilities of the HMR.
Also i think the mach 2 is rather stupid to get, ammo is $2 cheaper than the HMR for the same number of rounds but it doesn't have near the abilities of the HMR.
#8
RE: .17hmr vs. 17. mach 2
Not at all. The only thing I STRONGLY recommend is that you hit them in the head ONLY with these, and only use the ballistic tips for squirrel (HP bullets will get the job done, but they won't expand properly on something so small). If you hit them below the neck, you can forget using any meat from the front half of the body, but if you only go for the back legs and backstraps, I guess you wouldn't have that problem.