7WSM:Accubond vs Interbond ?
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hampstead, Maryland
Posts: 179
7WSM:Accubond vs Interbond ?
I have tested both the Nosler Accubond and the Hornady Interbond in my Winchester Ultimate Shadow chambered for 7mmWSM. Using 64gr of IMR4350, Fed Mag primers, 140gr bullets and new Win. cases, I am getting right at 3200fps from the 24" bbl, at 10' from the muzzle. The Nosler edges out the Interbond, accuracy wise, in my rifle. The Nosler is grouping consistantly inside 2" @ 200yds, shooting off the bench. Increasing the IMR4350 load opens up groups.
Does anyone have an accurate load that I can test in my rifle, that is giving appreciably higher velocities? Propellant?
I had tested Barnes TSX 140gr bullets, but he Nosler Accubond beats that bullet in accuracy, by a wide margin.
Does anyone have an accurate load that I can test in my rifle, that is giving appreciably higher velocities? Propellant?
I had tested Barnes TSX 140gr bullets, but he Nosler Accubond beats that bullet in accuracy, by a wide margin.
#2
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,205
RE: 7WSM:Accubond vs Interbond ?
Although I shoot a 7mm rem mag and not the WSM version, I just worked up a load of 79.5 H870 and a 160 Accubond. Excellent paper results, .75" at 100yds. I will use this on moose next month. If these bullets retain the weight as advertised, with that kind of accuracy I will likely drop partitions where I can. I hope they expand the lineup and include .35 cals.
#5
Although I shoot a 7mm rem mag and not the WSM version, I just worked up a load of 79.5 H870 and a 160 Accubond. Excellent paper results, .75" at 100yds. I will use this on moose next month. If these bullets retain the weight as advertised, with that kind of accuracy I will likely drop partitions where I can. I hope they expand the lineup and include .35 cals.