Nikon Buckmaster Vs. Bushnel Elite 3200

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

12-10-2007 | 08:01 PM

#11

Carpmaster

Giant Nontypical

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 5,702

Likes: 0

From: Somewhere in Michigan

RE: Nikon Buckmaster Vs. Bushnel Elite 3200

I have been very happy with the Fast Focus 3-9x40. I was really disgusted with a leupold vxII when i brought it home(it was on sale)and compared thetwo of them side by sidethat I took it back the next day. Just my opinion.

12-11-2007 | 08:39 AM

#12

oldelkhunter

Giant Nontypical

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 6,471

Likes: 0

From:

RE: Nikon Buckmaster Vs. Bushnel Elite 3200

Look at a Browning Scopes they are on closeout at Natchezz for 129.00 dollars for the 3-9x40. It is a BUSHNELL 3200 with some added features

12-12-2007 | 12:09 PM

#13

wpmcdaniel

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 102

Likes: 0

From: Trenton, SC

RE: Nikon Buckmaster Vs. Bushnel Elite 3200

Quote:

ORIGINAL: BUCKEYEhunter140

NIKON i have a BDC recticle n love it won't own any other scope now

Same here. I have a 4.5x14x40 on my .308 and love it.

12-12-2007 | 05:43 PM

#14

Bullet Hole Bailey

Thread Starter

Nontypical Buck

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 4,405

Likes: 0

From: Oregon

RE: Nikon Buckmaster Vs. Bushnel Elite 3200

I am going to get it with a Niko Plex.....probably

12-15-2007 | 12:43 AM

#15

kdvollmer

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 583

Likes: 0

From:

RE: Nikon Buckmaster Vs. Bushnel Elite 3200

I have shot the Nikon Buckmaster accuratly out to a little over 700 yds. (prairie dog shooting ) and with less bragabelresults out to closer to 1200. I can't claim any kills at the range. I currently have an Elite 3200 on my rifle that I have brough to Iraq. Between the 2 of them, hands down I would recommend the Nikon. As has already been said. for the money, you can't beat them. To be very honest, I would rather have my nikon back, over the 1000 Leupold MK 4 that I have on my ..338 LM.