Community
Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

stop complainin...start hunting

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #211  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default

As i pointed out before , the turkey population and the bear population increased as the deer herd increased. Other species such as grouse and snow shoes are more affected by forestry practices and competing species than they are by the deer. How much grouse habitat would you expect to find in DCNR's old growth forests in the stands of pole timber.
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:13 PM
  #212  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I think youre getting worked up over nothing doug. I see bb saying how many more deer he thinks could survive, nothing more in your quote. And you agree, to a point. But I dont see where bb is saying we should have that many as you infer???

As for impact, what is acceptable and what isnt is VERY debatable. Most dont see less than maximum stocking of trillium & hobblebush as "unacceptable" or "negative impact". And for most of the state, thats all the further the "damage" has gone, or will go. For most, its absolutely irrelavent....So in that light, there is no damage. There is fine habitat across most of the state by far. And plenty of deer food.

Last edited by Cornelius08; 02-04-2010 at 02:20 PM.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:16 PM
  #213  
Maverick 1's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cornelius08
A forest with no deer and no deer "impact" would be 100% unnatural.
Exactly right.
Maverick 1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:35 PM
  #214  
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Carbon County Pa.
Default

Originally Posted by JW!
Sure we can - Actually Not a bad idea - Hmmmmm........taking up space, wasting board space resources - saying absolutely nothing new.

As reported - I am the eyes and forum reporter......

JW

1876 views, sure is lots of interest for the same old thing.
pats102862 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:44 PM
  #215  
JW's Avatar
JW
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,490
Likes: 8
From: Wisconsin
Default

Yes maybe interest, but I was reading just a bit more animosity, in each successive post or reply, to which traditionally starts the name calling, and the resultant user reported posts.
JW is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:51 PM
  #216  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default

Guess who was the first to call me Larrybird?
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 03:46 PM
  #217  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Thats ok Jw!... You keep on keepin' us pennsyltuckians in line.

The quality of interaction in this forum has improved 10 fold compared to say even 6 months ago when often times, conversation wasnt even possible.

Last edited by Cornelius08; 02-04-2010 at 03:49 PM.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 05:33 PM
  #218  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default

Originally Posted by Cornelius08
Thats ok Jw!... You keep on keepin' us pennsyltuckians in line.

The quality of interaction in this forum has improved 10 fold compared to say even 6 months ago when often times, conversation wasnt even possible.

Agreed 100%
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2010 | 05:46 PM
  #219  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Default

Bob, some of us have become more tolerant. That's all.
livbucks is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 05:18 AM
  #220  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bluebird2
As i pointed out before , the turkey population and the bear population increased as the deer herd increased. Other species such as grouse and snow shoes are more affected by forestry practices and competing species than they are by the deer. How much grouse habitat would you expect to find in DCNR's old growth forests in the stands of pole timber.
Bear and turkeys don't browse.Other species like grouse need an early succession forest and a mid level understory.You're comparison is not valid.By the way,the exclosure that keep the deer from eating all of the new regeneration make nice grouse habitat.

The deer along with other factors have trashed the habitat in the northern tier.It's scientifically proven and not debatable.Sure more deer can survive but at the expense of poor habitat.I'm willing to settle for less deer to see better habitat for the future of the deer,other wildlife and yes the commercial value of the timber that's so vital to the economy of this region.
DougE is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.