|
BTW, you havent answered my question. What ideas do you have for improving the process of allocating doe licenses? |
I am just curious how you know that ?? Did you go sit there all day watching them fill out the permits ?? I did not realize we could go to the courthouse and watch?? I dont think our courthouse would allow anyone in the offices to see if their permits were drawn. I am not trying to br smart , but just curious how you knew so quick ?? I know years ago if you had a employee who worked at the courthouse it helped. Customer Name PALS Customer ID Date of Birth John Doe XXXXXX87007 01/21/1974 2009 Deer RESIDENT ANTLERLESS DEER Awarded Application Choices: First Choice: WMU 2G Harvest Tag Number: 09XXXXX Purchased at: TIOGA COUNTY TREASURER 118 MAIN ST WELLSBORO,PA 16901 Phone: 5707249213 |
You can go to the bottom of this page, click return and it will take you to a page to enter your CID number.
http://https://www2.pa.wildlifelicen.../deeravail.php |
It's a simple enough concept for anyone with elementary school math skills. The PGC calculates how many antlerless license it takes to generate a harvested deer for each WMU. RSB has posted those ratios here before If you can't answer that question, you don't know what you are talking about. |
still havent got my doe tag bradford co must be slow readers
|
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3385740)
Apparently you don't even have elementary level reading comprehension skills since you can't even comprehend the question. The question remains how does the PGC determine the number of antlerless deer that need to be harvested when they don't know how many deer we have and don't have any established DD goals?
If you can't answer that question, you don't know what you are talking about. I'm still waiting to hear how you would allocate the doe tags. Of course you wont offer any ideas because you have none. You can't offer any original positive ideas, you only try to twist and spin the work of others. |
Originally Posted by ManySpurs
(Post 3385728)
I must have missed the question. But I would start by allocating doe permits for state forest lands and state gamelands through the DMAP system for better control of harvests there.
Guess what? They already do that for state forest lands:hit: Oh and that answer still doesnt address how you would allocate the number of doe permits if you made the rules. Since you seem convinced that the PGC does it wrong, you would have to know the right way in order to recognize their method as being wrong. I'm anxiously awaiting your original ideas on that one. |
There is a vast difference between can't and refusing. I simply refuse enter into another idiotic game of trying to untwist your clever spin on everything presented to you. |
all joking aside got rust in my eye and am almost blind becase both are watering
|
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3385897)
That is a very lame excuse that shows without a doubt you have no idea how the PGC determines the antlerless allocations. If the process was logical and based on science there is nothing I could say to refute it. But, the fact that you can't explain the process means you don't understand the process which makes you just another blind follower like RsB.
Not as lame as the number one critic of all things PGC failing to produce even one shred of a better idea. Once again, how would YOU allocate the antlerless tags? We're all waiting for your dazzling response................ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.