HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   PA doe tags Going Going..... soon to be gone!!! (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/297904-pa-doe-tags-going-going-soon-gone.html)

bluebird2 07-16-2009 08:21 AM


If you're asking, as the bird is, for a rehash of the formula the PGC uses, do an archive search. I'm not wasting time digging up old news so that he or you can twist and spin the numbers to his own agenda all over again. If you wish to dispute the methodolgy for determining tag allocations, produce the data yourself and then explain the alleged flaws.
The formula for allocating doe tags was applicable when we had established DD goals in DPSM for each WMU. Once they switched to managing the herd based on herd and forest health the goals were abandoned and therefore the old formula is no longer valid since there are no DD goals. Since they claim that they don't know how many deer we have and there are no established goals, how do they know how many deer need to be harvested and how many tags are needed.

cvtrapper 07-16-2009 08:56 AM


Originally Posted by BTBowhunter (Post 3385158)
Obviously you are either very young or you don't live in PA.

SRA's are the last to sell for the same reasons that they have so many tags.

Land access is limited
It takes far more tags to harvest a deer in SRA's
Demand for 2B and other SRA's is lower especially early when a hunter must choose only one. They apply for the high demand areas first. 2B tags will still be readily available when most others have been snapped up.

Not young and I do live in PA. So the more land that is posted in a WMU the more tags are given out correct from what you said?So they are trying to get private land owners to kill off the deer on their property then also by giving out all those tags? How would that make deer hunting any good on SGL or SF then in those WMUs that have posted land and give out that many tags?

ManySpurs 07-16-2009 11:31 AM


Originally Posted by BTBowhunter (Post 3385306)
I answered your question. If you wish more detail than I provided, find it yourself.

Till now, you seemed to be a reasonable guy with different opinions on the issue. Now you are simply proving to be another mindless Bluebird drone with no real understanding of wildlife management and no thoughts of your own. If you have an issue with the methodology please point out that issue specifcally. Otherwise, you have simply shown a willingness to follow bluebirds lead in criticizing something you can't comprehend.

I am a reasonable guy asking a reasonable question of you. I'm neither a BlueBird drone, nor am I one with no real understanding of wildlife management or thoughts of my own. I haven't criticized, merely searching for an answer. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Do you have an answer to my question?:sheep:

BTBowhunter 07-16-2009 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by ManySpurs (Post 3385590)
I am a reasonable guy asking a reasonable question of you. I'm neither a BlueBird drone, nor am I one with no real understanding of wildlife management or thoughts of my own. I haven't criticized, merely searching for an answer. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Do you have an answer to my question?:sheep:



Did you search the archives of this forum like I suggested? :rolleye0011:Your answer is there. I've no intention of doing that search for you. Searching the archives of this forum is a tedious undertaking. I'm comfortable with the methodology. If you're not and you wish to have a better understanding of how doe tag allocations are arrived at, I suggest you seek out the explanations given by RSB and others here and in the PGC reports.

BTW, you havent answered my question. What ideas do you have for improving the process of allocating doe licenses?

bluebird2 07-16-2009 12:26 PM


Searching the archives of this forum is a tedious undertaking. I'm comfortable with the methodology. If you're not and you wish to have a better understanding of how doe tag allocations are arrived at, I suggest you seek out the explanations given by RSB and others here and in the PGC reports.
You are comfortable with the methodology because you don't understand the method they are using and no one else does either , including the PGC. There are no established DD goals for a WMU that is at it's goal for herd health but has poor forest health, therefore there is no way to calculate how many deer need to be harvested to improve forest health.

Herd health is no longer a determining factor in allocating tags since the PGC has declared all WMUs but 3D are at there goal. So the PGC is claiming that the herd is being managed based on forest health and deer/human conflicts and there are no established DD goals for either criteria.

BTBowhunter 07-16-2009 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by cvtrapper (Post 3385453)
Not young and I do live in PA. So the more land that is posted in a WMU the more tags are given out correct from what you said?So they are trying to get private land owners to kill off the deer on their property then also by giving out all those tags? How would that make deer hunting any good on SGL or SF then in those WMUs that have posted land and give out that many tags?


Actually I didn't say that. I said it takes more tags to generate a harvested deer in 2B where access is limited. In 2B, access is tough for many and the huge tag allocation compensates for that by allowing those who can get that access to harvest more deer. The abundance of tags does adversely affect some public areas but those are very few in 2B which was the WMU you asked about. Getting access isn't easy but it's there for those who make the effort. By effort, I mean a year round effort. I have some very good property to hunt but I jump through plenty of hoops to get and keep it and I've no sympathy for the guy who doesn't plan ahead and make the effort to get the access if they don't have their own property or where public land isnt available.

The guy who cant be bothered to think about where he's going to hunt till the weekend before the season deserves what he gets.

BTBowhunter 07-16-2009 12:46 PM


Originally Posted by bluebird2 (Post 3385634)
You are comfortable with the methodology because you don't understand the method they are using and no one else does either , including the PGC. There are no established DD goals for a WMU that is at it's goal for herd health but has poor forest health, therefore there is no way to calculate how many deer need to be harvested to improve forest health.

Herd health is no longer a determining factor in allocating tags since the PGC has declared all WMUs but 3D are at there goal. So the PGC is claiming that the herd is being managed based on forest health and deer/human conflicts and there are no established DD goals for either criteria.


LOL! yep they're just bumbling around in the dark!

So Mr wannabe wildlife manager, exactly what do you propose?
Tell us all how things would be better if Bluebird were calling the shots:popcorn:

bluebird2 07-16-2009 01:38 PM


LOL! yep they're just bumbling around in the dark!

So Mr wannabe wildlife manager, exactly what do you propose?
You are the one that is claiming that you are so knowledgeable that you understand how the PGC determines the number of doe tags allocated in each WMU. Manyspurs and others have ask you to explain how the PGC determines how many doe need to be killed ,so here is you chance to dazzle us all with your explanation of the allocation process. You can start by explaining how they determine how many doe need to be harvested in 2F and 2G. Thanks

BTBowhunter 07-16-2009 01:46 PM


Originally Posted by bluebird2 (Post 3385696)
You are the one that is claiming that you are so knowledgeable that you understand how the PGC determines the number of doe tags allocated in each WMU. Manyspurs and others have ask you to explain how the PGC determines how many doe need to be killed ,so here is you chance to dazzle us all with your explanation of the allocation process. You can start by explaining how they determine how many doe need to be harvested in 2F and 2G. Thanks

It's all been explained to you time and again right here in this forum. :confused0024:

You, however have dodged my question again.

Exactly whats wrong with the current system and how would you fix it???

Please by all means, dazzle us with your brilliant ideas!:popcorn:

cardeeer 07-16-2009 02:06 PM


Originally Posted by ManySpurs (Post 3385032)
My son and grandson each drew 2G tags today out of Tioga County Treasurers Office.

Now. Can you please tell me how the PGC decided those 2 tag allocations were warranted?:popcorn:

I am just curious how you know that ?? Did you go sit there all day watching them fill out the permits ?? I did not realize we could go to the courthouse and watch?? I dont think our courthouse would allow anyone in the offices to see if their permits were drawn. I am not trying to br smart , but just curious how you knew so quick ?? I know years ago if you had a employee who worked at the courthouse it helped.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.