PA doe tags Going Going..... soon to be gone!!!
08-21-2009 | 02:07 PM
#351
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Did more hunting pressure make hunting better in TL? Would you prefer to hunt deer that have been subject to heavy hunting pressure or deer that haven't seen in a hunter a week? How many legal buck did you say you saw during rifle season? Did you see that many legal buck in 2001 during the same period?
08-22-2009 | 05:48 PM
#352
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
No,and only a fool would try.If you find habitat that actually suits the deer,you'll find deer densities much higher than that,even in 2G.That's why so many people bitch about no deer.They hunt the same spots every year where they claim there's no deer.In most cases,they hunt where they can see the farthest.I see it every year.
08-22-2009 | 07:35 PM
#353
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
That is a classic example of the blind leading the blind. hunters in 2 G are already harvesting all the deer that can be harvested on a sustainable basis and clowns like you and Doug think the answer to the reduced harvests is for hunters to move more and hunt harder and reduce the herd even more. It doesn't get much dumber than that!!!
08-22-2009 | 08:12 PM
#355
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
That is a classic example of the blind leading the blind. hunters in 2 G are already harvesting all the deer that can be harvested on a sustainable basis and clowns like you and Doug think the answer to the reduced harvests is for hunters to move more and hunt harder and reduce the herd even more. It doesn't get much dumber than that!!!
