|
Originally Posted by crokit
(Post 3382306)
How is NON ar natural selection if AR, in your words,is the exact opposite of natural selection. I'm waiting on the edge of my seat with bated breath.
|
Blue bird: Only you could believe that you answered this post with your post 3 posts ago. |
Originally Posted by crokit
(Post 3382306)
How is NON ar natural selection if AR, in your words,is the exact opposite of natural selection. I'm waiting on the edge of my seat with bated breath.
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3382310)
A non-AR harvest is a random harvest of all bucks with one antler 3" or longer. It does not favor the harvest of bigger buck or protect inferior buck.
Originally Posted by crokit
(Post 3382383)
Blue bird: Only you could believe that you answered this post with your post 3 posts ago.
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3382504)
Just what were you trying to say? I can't quite figure it out.
|
Thank you Bowtruck for your understanding.
Never said I was wanting to determine who could post or not - asked for a little consideration from those dominating the NE forum. Corny - your hot air will keep the Pa whoa is me threads sailing for a long time. Steve |
Blue bird: Only you could believe that you answered this post with your post 3 posts ago. |
Oh. Asking for a little consideration... Is that what you call this whiney drivel and your other posts just like it??
"Could the Pa guys who have argued for 100's of threads and 1000's of repeated posts under who knows how many alter ego screen names, let the NY hunters have one thread to debate amongst themselves? You obviously can neither fix or agree on what Pa needs/doesn't need/wants or has done - how can you possibly hope to offer anything of value to NYer's?" Stevey, I think you need to get this through your skull: You do not dictate who posts...Where they post....or what they post. So you can take your little bossy Napolean complex and shove it. You try that crap on other boards too, unsuccessfully. Btw, howd that attitude work for you and buddies over on Griz garys board? Seems he finally got tired of of the b.s. and put some of the biggest whiners in their place. I guess some never learn. |
I found it interesting that the DEC report showed NY hunters raised the same issues for and against ARs as PA hunters. The big difference is that DEC told the truth about ARs while the PGC sold ARs to PA hunters based on lies.
|
Originally Posted by bawanajim
(Post 3382090)
I think your missing a great opportunity for some incredible hunting.
I see no reason not to let the age of the herd to increase and with this age a better generic make up of the herd will surface. .:wave:
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3382191)
Did you mean the "genetic" make up of the herd? If so the exact opposite is more likely to occur since ARs are the exact opposite of natural selection.
You state that the opposite of " a BETTER genetic make-up will occur ". That can only mean, at least to us in NY State, that you are saying a WORSE genetic make-up will occur. You know, opposite of BETTER. If AR's have that effect, as you say, then non- AR's HAVE to have at least that effect. Unless, of course, in a non-ar region, hunters are allowing all breeding age buck to pass. Let's see, I'm hunting in a non-AR zone, and I have the choice of shooting that small 8pt, or that crotch horn next to him. Yup, your right, I'm Naturally selecting the crotch horn. LMAOAYDS. You got any more of that $hit?, or is it " one dog, one bone " |
It not as simple as you might like to think it is and the experts disagree with you. The big difference is ARs protect the smallest buck in each age class while a non-AR harvest make all antlered buck with at least 3" spike legal.
Here is what happened as a result of 12 years of ARs in Miss. MDWFP DEER COMMITTEE Chad M.Dacus Deer Program Coordinator (601) 432-2177 • [email protected] William T.McKinley Why not the 4-Point Law? Research conducted by the MDWFP and Mississippi State University indicates the 4-point law has reduced the antler size of harvested 2.5 and 3.5 year old bucks across the state. Researchers and biologists believe the 4-point law allows the harvest of better quality yearling bucks, while protecting lesser quality spikes and 3- point bucks. The result has been a decrease in antler size within age classes of older bucks. The combination ofthe 4-point law, high hunting pressure, and lower reproduction has resulted in the over-harvest of bucks and decreased antler size in deer herds across Mississippi. |
Simply commenting on your quotes that I listed two posts ago, quotes regarding natural selection. Those quotes are clearly wrong. :party0007: As far as the experts, the jury is still out on them.
P.S.: Just a little advice: One of the greatest deficiencies a man can have is the inability to admit he's wrong. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.