Community
Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Pa Antler Restrictions

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-17-2009 | 06:27 AM
  #31  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

but ARs must stay.
Why? Do you want the average rack size of 2.5 + buck to decrease?
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 06:36 AM
  #32  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

The thing about this poll,Is how many people that voted was from PA? I am from NY and just voted on it to skew it up. You know PA people are not the only ones who are going to vote on it. Let everyone who voted on this poll post their name and what state they are from. Then you can see the accurate numbers much better. If I put up a poll about NY,I know everyone would be voting on it also. This is not about what other persons from otherstates thinks,But what people in the PA state thinks. So this poll is junk.
explorer_Jack is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 07:43 AM
  #33  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

Plenty of guys on here from other states that hunt PA. Are you saying they shouldnt be able to vote?

If you hunt PA thanks for your vote. If you don't, why would you bother voting just to "skew things up" ?
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 08:31 AM
  #34  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

ORIGINAL: gunnermhr

Spread is a bad deal for seveal reasons. First and formost if a guy shot a buck that was under the determined "legal" limit he is likely to let it lay and continue to hunt. 2nd you could have a buck that scores in the 130" that has a relativly small spread. Keep the current AR's that are in place now cause they work and limit the DOE KILL
i agree, very dumb idea.

AR should be for all of us in wmu2g
sproulman is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 08:40 AM
  #35  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

A lot of guys who support Ars do so because they simply don't understand how much it reduces the buck harvest. In 2006 we harvested 75,762 ,1.5 buck and if ARs saved 50% then we carried over 75,762, 1.5 bucks. but in 2007 we only harvested 34,114, 2.5 buck which is only 45% of the bucks that were protected by ARs. How many of the 41,648 2.5 bucks that weren't harvested were lost to non-hunting mortality,weren't AR legal,were killed as antlerless or survived to be 3.5 buck.
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 08:41 AM
  #36  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

ORIGINAL: livbucks

There are less deer. We could throttle back on the doe tags some at this point in many WMUs, but ARs must stay.
livbucks, you are right but we must THROTTLE back a lot because sprouls interviews showed that say out of 10 hunters in crew , only 3 got a doe.

so, you still have 7 without doe.

ONE DEER AND YOUR DONE WOULD HELP SOME BUT STILL WOULD NOT IMPACT MUCH/

we need 3 day of doe only and no doe hunting rest of season.,
sproulman is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 08:57 AM
  #37  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

A lot of guys who support Ars do so because they simply don't understand how much it reduces the buck harvest. In 2006 we harvested 75,762 ,1.5 buck and if ARs saved 50% then we carried over 75,762, 1.5 bucks. but in 2007 we only harvested 34,114, 2.5 buck which is only 45% of the bucks that were protected by ARs. How many of the 41,648 2.5 bucks that weren't harvested were lost to non-hunting mortality,weren't AR legal,were killed as antlerless or survived to be 3.5 buck.
AR didnt reduce the buck harvest, HR did. The idea that the bucks would die anyway if we dont kill most of them as 1.5 year olds is simply ridiculous and no credible research supports that notion.
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 09:34 AM
  #38  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

So it is possible to save does for mature breeding stock, but it is not possible to save bucks past 1.5?
Funny way of saying you want to sit on a stump, see 35 does/fawns and shoot a spike, all before 9am opening day of rifle season.
livbucks is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 09:45 AM
  #39  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions

Ya know Greg, I bet almost everyone on this MB could find a lot more common ground if not for the constant pot stirring and distortions from Blueboy. Even when threads seem to be heading toward a consensus..... Bam.... we get hit fromthe skyby some more Bluebird poop
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 09:53 AM
  #40  
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Carbon County Pa.
Default RE: Pa Antler Restrictions






This deer was taken on water authority land open to the public for hunting. I hunted this area as a kid and the guy who took it hunted the area for 49 years. All the guys who hunt this areasay this is by far the biggest buck taken outof there. I firmly believe antler restrictions along with responsible hunters allowed this deer to grow to the141-4/8 monster that he is.
pats102862 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.