Pa Antler Restrictions
01-21-2009 | 09:08 AM
#171
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
You won't convince these guys that antler restrictions aren't working as this guy keeps excellent records.
01-21-2009 | 09:36 AM
#172
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
No,but his records indicate that he's mounting way more bucks,more older bucks,and much larger bucks.To boot,he's doing in the WMU that has the lowest dd inthe entire state.
How does a buck get wasted?Is it a waste if they die from any means otherthan a hunter's bullet?
How does a buck get wasted?Is it a waste if they die from any means otherthan a hunter's bullet?
01-21-2009 | 11:11 AM
#174
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
How does a buck get wasted?Is it a waste if they die from any means other than a hunter's bullet?
01-21-2009 | 11:17 AM
#176
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Breeding rates were supposed to increase statewide as a result of HR and ARs. Breeding rates would increase the most in areas with the lowest breeding rates and that is why in my example I increased the breeding rates by just 4%. But, you doubled the sample size in the areas with the lowest breeding rates with no logical justification. Did road kills suddenly double in 2f and 2G due to HR. Your example has no relation to reality,whereas mine reflects what was supposed to happen.
Breeding rates were supposed to increase statewide as a result of HR and ARs. Breeding rates would increase the most in areas with the lowest breeding rates and that is why in my example I increased the breeding rates by just 4%. But, you doubled the sample size in the areas with the lowest breeding rates with no logical justification. Did road kills suddenly double in 2f and 2G due to HR. Your example has no relation to reality,whereas mine reflects what was supposed to happen.
if that is true, its not true, we are seeing very few fawns ,if any.
01-21-2009 | 11:23 AM
#178
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
are you saying that with the reduced number of doe that the PGC says that the breeding rates will be better..
01-21-2009 | 11:38 AM
#179
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
So while my example was designed to reflect reality, yours was totally divorced from reality and designed to deceive and mislead.
You flat out said it was impossible for a shift in sampling location to cause a 5% difference in breeding rates. My example merely showed that it was not only possible but in fact, exposed the fact that you needed to change another variable to make the possible appear impossible. You lied, you clearly got busted. Now why not move on?
01-21-2009 | 11:38 AM
#180
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
That's what the PGC and RSB have been saying for years and that is why the 5% decrease in breeding rates is so significant.
are you saying thatwith the reduced number of doe that the PGC says that the breeding rates will be better..
i may call charles owner right now to get a study of his fawns.