ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Breeding rates were supposed to increase statewide as a result of HR and ARs. Breeding rates would increase the most in areas with the lowest breeding rates and that is why in my example I increased the breeding rates by just 4%. But, you doubled the sample size in the areas with the lowest breeding rates with no logical justification. Did road kills suddenly double in 2f and 2G due to HR. Your example has no relation to reality,whereas mine reflects what was supposed to happen.
are you saying thatwith the reduced number of doe that the PGC says that the breeding rates will be better..
if that is true, its not true, we are seeing very few fawns ,if any.