So while my example was designed to reflect reality, yours was totally divorced from reality and designed to deceive and mislead.
The only reality your posts reflect is the one between your ears.
You flat out said it was
impossible for a shift in sampling location to cause a 5% difference in breeding rates. My example merely showed that it was not only possible but in fact, exposed the fact that you needed to change another variable to make the possible appear impossible. You lied, you clearly got busted. Now why not move on?