More Spin From RSB
#101
Typical Buck
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
I am quite familiar with the Kaibob Plateau report and i fully agree that deer can devastate their habitat. But , unlike you, I am quite familiar with the history of our herd in the NC part of our state and it tells different story than the one you are selling. Over browsing began in the NC counties in the 20s and 30s, yet the herd increased to over 40 DPSM in the late 70's. Then, a severe ice storm reduced the herd , but by the late 80s the herd had rebounded to around 30DPSM and the PGC implemented bonus tags to control the herd. That does not happen when the habitat has been severly damaged and the herd is above the MSY carrying capacity.
It is highly presumptuous for you to make that claim when you have no idea who I am or what my background might be. The fact is I have been studying whitetail ecology and the relationship of deer to their habitat for over 50 years. I can cite chapter and verse of deer management in PA to a point that will make your head spin.
Are you familiar with the Brady Lake Browse Study, the 1984 " Clearcut Update" the 2006 DCNr ,"Browse Impact study" or the studies by David Declasta?
Not so. The damage done by the herd actually limited the herds recoupment due to the devestation of the understory. Look up the kaibob plateau to fully understand what a deer herd can do to decimate a habitat.
As far as dealing with theories, I would beg to differ. I have been studying whitetail ecology and habitat enhancement since long before you knew what it was. I have been studying this stuff for close to thirty years now.
Are you familiar with the Brady Lake Browse Study, the 1984 " Clearcut Update" the 2006 DCNr ,"Browse Impact study" or the studies by David Declasta?
#102
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Not so. The damage done by the herd actually limited the herds recoupment due to the devestation of the understory. Look up the kaibob plateau to fully understand what a deer herd can do to decimate a habitat.
I am more than willing to have a civil conversation with anyone who knows how to have a civil conversation . As yet you have not demonstrated that ability. Would you like to start over and see if we can both learn from each other?
#103
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Remnard said: "You're already making my head spin, and I think my stomach turn also. Why don't you just have civil conversation and knock off the cowboy keyboard act. I am here trying to learn more and I don't need your senile "I know more than you macho ****".
A few postsPreviously you said: "I have been studying whitetail ecology and habitat enhancement since long before you knew what it was. I have been studying this stuff for close to thirty years now"
Perhaps you should take your own advice.... Till then, Yippee Ki Yi get along little dogie! (LOL)
Bb, I dont think Remnard is gonna learn anything from anyone. It seems he already knows it all.[8D]
A few postsPreviously you said: "I have been studying whitetail ecology and habitat enhancement since long before you knew what it was. I have been studying this stuff for close to thirty years now"
Perhaps you should take your own advice.... Till then, Yippee Ki Yi get along little dogie! (LOL)
Bb, I dont think Remnard is gonna learn anything from anyone. It seems he already knows it all.[8D]
#104
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Bb, I dont think Remnard is gonna learn anything from anyone. It seems he already knows it all.
#105
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Here is another prediction I made about the negative effects of HR and ARs. I predicted hunting pressure would drop like a rock in many areas because hunters would become disgusted with seeing so few deer and in my area that prediction has come true. I have never seen so few hunters on the first Sat. and there was very little shooting. I'd guess archery hunting was down by 20-30% and that rifle is down around 40-50%. If this continues the herd will increase significantly the next few years and the PGC will be back at square one.
#107
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
That may be the case in some areas but it doesn't appear to be the case where I am hunting in 5C. We have loads of antlerless tags available but the hunters just aren't out there trying to fill them.
#108
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
That may be the case in some areas but it doesn't appear to be the case where I am hunting in 5C. We have loads of antlerless tags available but the hunters just aren't out there trying to fill them.
That may be the case in some areas but it doesn't appear to be the case where I am hunting in 5C. We have loads of antlerless tags available but the hunters just aren't out there trying to fill them.
#109
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
That may be your opinion , but it certainly isn't a fact . It wouldn't make much sense for someone to drive to a different WMU with less deer, just to harvest a doe. Because of the low deer numbers our group of six hunters haven't harvested a doe the past 2 seasons and as yet we haven't taken a doe this year ,although the group has had numerous opportunities.
#110
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
It will all balance out bluebird.The first light they get of the herd increasing they'll up the doe tags and or hand out dmaps like no tommorrow



