Slim Jinsky spin
04-29-2006 | 12:59 AM
#61
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
Unfortunately it's easier for some to attack, or try to change the subject rather than discuss or answer legitimate questions about a self appointed guru.
Now once again, can any of his followers answer any of the topics questions?
The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
Now once again, can any of his followers answer any of the topics questions?
The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
It almost seems as if he's been disagreeing with everyone for ratings and doesn't really care about what's actually right. Spin sparks controversy. You take a look and decide.
04-29-2006 | 06:11 AM
#62
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
The real underlieing fault of this whole thread is captured in the title "Slim Jinsky Spin."Whenever anyone resorts to maligning another man's name to make his point, (be it correct or wrong) it shows a lack of respect not only for the man being attacked, but also for the body it is presented to.
Would anyone tolerate such an attack face to face? I dare say not.But, hiding behind the internet one can be as malicious as one chooses and face no consequence. What this shows issomething lacking in the presenter's character. Most likely a fault from birth, undiscovered until recently with the advent of the internet.
I would suggest that "Meat Hunter" or "Shooter" (however he wishes to be called) attendMr. Slinsky'snext speaking engagement (they're free) and address Jim face to face with his questions and choice of address. I'm sure Mr. Slinsky would be pleased to answer him, and it justmight make for some interesting dialogue.
Would anyone tolerate such an attack face to face? I dare say not.But, hiding behind the internet one can be as malicious as one chooses and face no consequence. What this shows issomething lacking in the presenter's character. Most likely a fault from birth, undiscovered until recently with the advent of the internet.
I would suggest that "Meat Hunter" or "Shooter" (however he wishes to be called) attendMr. Slinsky'snext speaking engagement (they're free) and address Jim face to face with his questions and choice of address. I'm sure Mr. Slinsky would be pleased to answer him, and it justmight make for some interesting dialogue.
04-29-2006 | 05:11 PM
#63
Typical Buck
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Pa.
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
Thank you AJ52, you are exactly right. Unfortunately it's easier for some to attack, or try to change the subject rather than discuss or answer legitimate questions about a self appointed guru
When you attack someones friend or club both in this case, expect them to defend themself, I have been trying to defend the NRA for over 40yrs. on attacks like these.
When you attack someones friend or club both in this case, expect them to defend themself, I have been trying to defend the NRA for over 40yrs. on attacks like these.
04-30-2006 | 08:12 AM
#65
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
I would suggest that "Meat Hunter" or "Shooter" (however he wishes to be called) attendMr. Slinsky'snext speaking engagement (they're free) and address Jim face to face with his questions and choice of address.
04-30-2006 | 08:27 PM
#67
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
" Your subsequent rhetorical questions/statements got answered."
Crazy, you obviously don't know me. I would have no problem telling ol' slim what I think of him to his face. In fact, in some sort of twisted way I would even enjoy that. But I have seen him speak in the past. I knew from that point on he was a deceitful person with an agenda, and that was years ago. He hasn't let us down since. I wouldn't waste my time seeing him again. His message is still the same, and now adays I get Comedy Central. And why would I want to ask him in public? That's like asking Dan Rather why he aired false documents on President Bush. He's got the public forum to say whatever he wants without proving it (like he does now) and without my rebuttal, to an audience of HIS deciples. It would be akin to asking Alt about the 1.6 mil. number in a room full of shissler's and moyer's! You'd never get a straight answer. Kind like this thread!
Besides, you just want me there to boost your attendance number... trickey.
Can anyone answer those questions yet?
05-01-2006 | 02:20 PM
#68
Typical Buck
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Pa.
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
ORIGINAL: MeatHunter2
Thank you AJ52, you are exactly right. Unfortunately it's easier for some to attack, or try to change the subject rather than discuss or answer legitimate questions about a self appointed guru.
Now once again, can any of his followers answer any of the topics questions?
The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
* Why does he say he'd be the pgc gets a bad rap and its a much tougher job than most would think because they don't understand? But you can almost count on his articles bad mouthing either hunters or the pgc. He's the one giving out the bad rap and fostering this division.
* Why did he say hunters who don't want to pay for more game lands are selfish and greedy, but then turn around and support that same crowd who just recently said that again at a recent meeting in Dubois?
* Why does he say the wmu's should be based on terrain, habitat cover, and human density; then when they are he complains about it?
Why does he explain that there's always hot and cold spots and there's no way around, but then complain about it when there becomes more cold spots?
* Why does he want to go back to those traditional seasons that he says creates those hot and cold spots?
* Why does he say those uninformed hunters always give the solution of closing the doe season, and now he claims the solution IS to close the doe season?
* And why does he claim to not be a member of the usp when he mentions them at every chance he gets and speaks at all their meetings. Any normal person who believes in an organization (I use that term loosely) would become a member and proudly claim to be.
Thank you AJ52, you are exactly right. Unfortunately it's easier for some to attack, or try to change the subject rather than discuss or answer legitimate questions about a self appointed guru.
Now once again, can any of his followers answer any of the topics questions?
The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
* Why does he say he'd be the pgc gets a bad rap and its a much tougher job than most would think because they don't understand? But you can almost count on his articles bad mouthing either hunters or the pgc. He's the one giving out the bad rap and fostering this division.
* Why did he say hunters who don't want to pay for more game lands are selfish and greedy, but then turn around and support that same crowd who just recently said that again at a recent meeting in Dubois?
* Why does he say the wmu's should be based on terrain, habitat cover, and human density; then when they are he complains about it?
Why does he explain that there's always hot and cold spots and there's no way around, but then complain about it when there becomes more cold spots?
* Why does he want to go back to those traditional seasons that he says creates those hot and cold spots?
* Why does he say those uninformed hunters always give the solution of closing the doe season, and now he claims the solution IS to close the doe season?
* And why does he claim to not be a member of the usp when he mentions them at every chance he gets and speaks at all their meetings. Any normal person who believes in an organization (I use that term loosely) would become a member and proudly claim to be.
05-05-2006 | 03:35 PM
#69
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
Funny how you'll believe anything else he says without question. No, I don't believe everything. But your avoidance of you and your pals to even attempt to answer these legitimate questions leads me to believe it is. But as I said, I don't have the tape, just a reliable source. He's your buddy, ask him. I'm sure he has tapes of his shows laying around. I checked his website and it's not there. Though there is an interesting interview of CW Severinghas setting him straight. He couldn't lead that old fart. He caught on.
Now has anyone came up with answers to those questions yet? Surely someone can come up with some legitimate answers by now.
The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
* Why does he say he'd be the pgc gets a bad rap and its a much tougher job than most would think because they don't understand? But you can almost count on his articles bad mouthing either hunters or the pgc. He's the one giving out the bad rap and fostering this division.
* Why did he say hunters who don't want to pay for more game lands are selfish and greedy, but then turn around and support that same crowd who just recently said that again at a recent meeting in Dubois?
* Why does he say the wmu's should be based on terrain, habitat cover, and human density; then when they are he complains about it?
Why does he explain that there's always hot and cold spots and there's no way around, but then complain about it when there becomes more cold spots?
* Why does he want to go back to those traditional seasons that he says creates those hot and cold spots?
* Why does he say those uninformed hunters always give the solution of closing the doe season, and now he claims the solution IS to close the doe season?
* And why does he claim to not be a member of the usp when he mentions them at every chance he gets and speaks at all their meetings. Any normal person who believes in an organization (I use that term loosely) would become a member and proudly claim to be.
Now has anyone came up with answers to those questions yet? Surely someone can come up with some legitimate answers by now.
The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
* Why does he say he'd be the pgc gets a bad rap and its a much tougher job than most would think because they don't understand? But you can almost count on his articles bad mouthing either hunters or the pgc. He's the one giving out the bad rap and fostering this division.
* Why did he say hunters who don't want to pay for more game lands are selfish and greedy, but then turn around and support that same crowd who just recently said that again at a recent meeting in Dubois?
* Why does he say the wmu's should be based on terrain, habitat cover, and human density; then when they are he complains about it?
Why does he explain that there's always hot and cold spots and there's no way around, but then complain about it when there becomes more cold spots?
* Why does he want to go back to those traditional seasons that he says creates those hot and cold spots?
* Why does he say those uninformed hunters always give the solution of closing the doe season, and now he claims the solution IS to close the doe season?
* And why does he claim to not be a member of the usp when he mentions them at every chance he gets and speaks at all their meetings. Any normal person who believes in an organization (I use that term loosely) would become a member and proudly claim to be.
05-05-2006 | 05:42 PM
#70
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Slim Jinsky spin
At first I thought you might be "Shooter" from that(PGC) web site "hunting...something or other. But upon closer examination of yourTROLLING posts I've concluded that your not "Shooter." Your lack of basic english skills eliminates that.
But I have figured out who you really are. Your "BEETLE-JUICE"!!!
(Back from the grave.)
But I have figured out who you really are. Your "BEETLE-JUICE"!!!
(Back from the grave.)