Law banning "canned" hunts in Indiana...
04-13-2006 | 03:41 PM
#81
Spike
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: G.R. Mich.
RE: Law banning "canned" hunts in Indiana...
ORIGINAL: Big Country
Out of curiousity, who would be the bigger slob.............
1. A guy that kills an animal at a legitimate, legally run high fence operation.
2. A guy that goes to camp for the opener of gun season, goes hunting while hungover, or worse yet, drunk, and does not obey game laws.
Which one of these two would be the "slob hunter"?
ORIGINAL: bigcountry
Goodness, thought we lived in the good ole USA where a guy could be a slob hunter if he wants too.
Goodness, thought we lived in the good ole USA where a guy could be a slob hunter if he wants too.
1. A guy that kills an animal at a legitimate, legally run high fence operation.
2. A guy that goes to camp for the opener of gun season, goes hunting while hungover, or worse yet, drunk, and does not obey game laws.
Which one of these two would be the "slob hunter"?
04-13-2006 | 03:50 PM
#82
Spike
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: G.R. Mich.
RE: Law banning "canned" hunts in Indiana...
Your ethics are the same as most of us..however, legitimate and legal should not be in thisinstance, as we all know that there are some out there that find this O.K. after all it would be "legal, and legitimate" and just as ethical to him/her as it isn't to you, I or 99% of the others we have here
04-15-2006 | 12:35 AM
#83
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Law banning "canned" hunts in Indiana...
ORIGINAL: excalibur43
The owner of the farm won the case.
The owner of the farm won the case.
04-15-2006 | 03:48 AM
#84
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: Licking County, Ohio
RE: Law banning "canned" hunts in Indiana...
ORIGINAL: bigbuckOO
Well i guess that depends on how you define winning. If your idea of winning is spending a few years in prision, paying half a mill in fines, and providing the ammunition for people in this state to shut all similar businesses of his down, then yes, i would say he won alright.
ORIGINAL: excalibur43
The owner of the farm won the case.
The owner of the farm won the case.
Rodney Bruce was not fined anything or put in jail, because he didn't break any laws!. He did however, win an injunction which blocked state officials from taking any kind of action to stop hunts on his high fence preserve, Whitetail Bluff! This is only a temporary injunction, however he has won thus far!
04-15-2006 | 09:30 PM
#85
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Law banning "canned" hunts in Indiana...
ORIGINAL: excalibur43
Rodney Bruce was not fined anything or put in jail, because he didn't break any laws!. He did however, win an injunction which blocked state officials from taking any kind of action to stop hunts on his high fence preserve, Whitetail Bluff! This is only a temporary injunction, however he has won thus far!
ORIGINAL: bigbuckOO
Well i guess that depends on how you define winning. If your idea of winning is spending a few years in prision, paying half a mill in fines, and providing the ammunition for people in this state to shut all similar businesses of his down, then yes, i would say he won alright.
ORIGINAL: excalibur43
The owner of the farm won the case.
The owner of the farm won the case.
Rodney Bruce was not fined anything or put in jail, because he didn't break any laws!. He did however, win an injunction which blocked state officials from taking any kind of action to stop hunts on his high fence preserve, Whitetail Bluff! This is only a temporary injunction, however he has won thus far!
