![]() |
Thanks common sense. I thought I got ripped a little over my experience about my remington rusting. Yes it was a bead blast finish that rusted almost over night. Next question is what does a guy do when he is hunting all day in drizzle or snow? Wipe it down every 2 hours on the stand? I know bead blast is cheaper but I never saw a gun rust like that and I've owned lots of Rems. It was my favorite gun since I could buy guns. I got accused of neglect a few pages back. Oh well, maybe some of your guns are gun cabinet queens, mine are not. They get beat up real nice and work for me or I get rid of them. They have to make a gun that doesn't rust in a day and a half. Period.
|
Thanks common sense. I thought I got ripped a little over my experience about my remington rusting. Yes it was a bead blast finish that rusted almost over night. I got accused of neglect a few pages back. Next question is what does a guy do when he is hunting all day in drizzle or snow? Wipe it down every 2 hours on the stand? I know bead blast is cheaper but I never saw a gun rust like that and I've owned lots of Rems. They have to make a gun that doesn't rust in a day and a half. Period. |
I don't think they oiled it at the factory. If they did I don't think I would have had that much rust. I have an adl almost like it and it doesn't rust. Oh well the sps 700 youth carries very well.
|
I have two SPS's, and I have never seen any rust on either one, I have hunted in the poreing rain for weeks at a time without wipeing them down for days after. Matter of fact I used my 243 last deer season in the snow and rain and I have yet to clean it, it shows absolutly no signs of rust, it looks as good as the day I bought it.
|
Originally Posted by CommonSense
(Post 3766140)
Shame on you zrex, now all of the Remchester fanboys will come out of the woodwork to proclaim how awesome their super whiz bang Model 700 ABCD is, and how their quality isn't declining, oh well, when that's all you have experience with, and don't know any better......
i agree. i have a cousin who swears by remingtons... and he's never owned anything but remington 700's. i've owned weatherby VG, remington 710, and winchester model 70's. alomost completely needless to say that winchester has been far and away the best of those. the vanguard is a pretty decent gun though. i spent $268.99 on it in 30-06 after my employee discount at the time. still one of the best purchases ever. i would like to say, that maybe it's not the gun, but the quality of the optics some of these base models come with. bushnell...? really? not that bushy's can't kill some deer, but they sure aren't nikon or leupold or swaravski. |
Originally Posted by warbirdlover
(Post 3774385)
I'm not a fantatic "backer" of any brand rifle. I just bought a 700 SPS Buckmasters because I loved the camo stock and the all black action. It's smooth as silk, the trigger is the best of all the rifles I tried in the store and it's a very pretty gun. the bore is glass smooth. I checked it against all the other rifles; Tikka T3 (looked cheap), TC Venture and Icon (almost bought one of these), Weatherby Vanguard (horrible, gritty trigger), Browning X-Bolt and A-bolt, Winchester 70 (better then the pre-64's now), Sako A7 (black bolt shroud on a stainless bolt?) and the cheap Marlin and Mossberg bolts. Midwest Shooters Supply (Lomira, Wis) didn't have any Savages but I really don't like the looks of them anyway. I wanted to look at CZ's but none there either. The Remington 700 just stood out as more pleasing to my eye and the price was right (with the rebate) so I bought it. I just got the scope on it so will be shooting it soon and will report on results. I spend alot of time at the range and am an above average shot.
And poorer quality? Get used to it because everything you buy is not going to be like it was 20 years ago, cars, clothes, houses and food. The euro rifles are not going to still make them like the "old world" anymore either. Check out the new Sako 85's compared to the Finnbear. Not even close. |
Yep, no question quality has gone down hill on alot of manufacturing companies in the last 20yrs.However, when a Company allegedlly knows it producing and shipping faulty products and continue to do so to the public that is different. I'm not saying Remington is outright guilty of killing or injuring people or putting put a faulty product. But I am saying there must have been enough evidence against Remington for them to settle out of court in alot of court cases. Way to many settlements, for me to even consider purchasing a Factory Remington Rifle in s model 700. That being said the model 700 is a fine action rifle, and made under the right hands. I would have no problem having a Rem 700 made by a competant gunsmith.
|
Remington WAS a great gun years ago, however they have gone down the road to ruine by making their product cheap and lack of customer service. Quality is not there anymore. My opinion!!!:party0005:
|
I don't think Savage has gone down hill. Some are getting better and more accurate. Automation can be a good thing. Cars are better too but only through technology.
|
Originally Posted by ihookem1
(Post 3777282)
I don't think Savage has gone down hill. Some are getting better and more accurate. Automation can be a good thing. Cars are better too but only through technology.
|
Originally Posted by mr.mc54
(Post 3777098)
Remington WAS a great gun years ago, however they have gone down the road to ruine by making their product cheap and lack of customer service. Quality is not there anymore. My opinion!!!:party0005:
BECAUSE I HAVE NEVER HAD EVEN ONE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF THE REMINGTONS I HAVE EVER OWNED AND I HAVE OWNED A LOAD OF THEM!!! You guys are talking out your butts and I love spinning you guys up. It's just to darn easy. LMFAO!!!!:s2: |
I have a laminate/SS version of remington and savage rifles. look at the stainless finish on a savage, and look at a remington 700's, the remingtons is much nicer, stocks a bit nicer too, IMO. Savages trigger is better though. Theres good and bad aspects of all rifles brands.
|
At one time every rifle and shotgun in my gun safe was a Remington. Nows except for a couple stragglers, you won't find any. They have been replaced with Savage and Brownings with a Winchester here and there and one lone Marlin Guide gun.
|
Originally Posted by bronko22000
(Post 3777780)
At one time every rifle and shotgun in my gun safe was a Remington. Nows except for a couple stragglers, you won't find any. They have been replaced with Savage and Brownings with a Winchester here and there and one lone Marlin Guide gun.
|
![]() ![]() |
Repeat after methis thread is gay ...this thread is gay:rolleye0011:
|
This thread is dumb. Somebody out there has a Remington that will out shoot a winchester and somebody else has a Howa that will out shoot a Remington. Then TC makes a new improved super rifle. Weatherby is the best of all times but it goes back to the gunsmiths more than any other rifle combined, not because it don't shoot they just don't know how to build a stock that stands up to that kind of pressure. Savage is kicking butt at the average joe level and then maybe Remington/Marlin will out do them next year. Ruger just sucks period. Lets all convince FIE to build rifles so we can all get blown up on the first trigger pull.
Maybe if we took every manufacturer and made a Frankenstein Model 007 then it would be the perfect rifle and then we would only have one rifle manufacturer and they would only cost $10,000.00 because being only one rifle manufacturer they can set the price. Do ya see how all this sounds. Kinda Silly huh. If you don't like Rumagetons, Whinechesters or any other Parts slapper on'ers don't buy one. |
Originally Posted by Blackelk
(Post 3777945)
This thread is dumb. Somebody out there has a Remington that will out shoot a winchester and somebody else has a Howa that will out shoot a Remington. Then TC makes a new improved super rifle. Weatherby is the best of all times but it goes back to the gunsmiths more than any other rifle combined, not because it don't shoot they just don't know how to build a stock that stands up to that kind of pressure. Savage is kicking butt at the average joe level and then maybe Remington/Marlin will out do them next year. Ruger just sucks period. Lets all convince FIE to build rifles so we can all get blown up on the first trigger pull.
Maybe if we took every manufacturer and made a Frankenstein Model 007 then it would be the perfect rifle and then we would only have one rifle manufacturer and they would only cost $10,000.00 because being only one rifle manufacturer they can set the price. Do ya see how all this sounds. Kinda Silly huh. If you don't like Rumagetons, Whinechesters or any other Parts slapper on'ers don't buy one. |
Zrex, I am curious, why do you care so much if others like remington rifles? It appears, your rather obsessed with other's likes and dislikes. Just an observation from an outsider looking in.
|
Originally Posted by bigcountryextreme
(Post 3777981)
Zrex, I am curious, why do you care so much if others like remington rifles? It appears, your rather obsessed with other's likes and dislikes. Just an observation from an outsider looking in.
|
Originally Posted by bigcountryextreme
(Post 3777981)
Zrex, I am curious, why do you care so much if others like remington rifles? It appears, your rather obsessed with other's likes and dislikes. Just an observation from an outsider looking in.
I just like rustling the feathers of rem fans, they get sooooo defensive. |
Originally Posted by zrexpilot
(Post 3778188)
I just like rustling the feathers of rem fans, they get sooooo defensive.
I'm not a doctor but I slept in a Holiday Inn last night and I recommend you untwist your panties, take two Midol and then call me in the morning!! LMFAO!!!!:happy0157::happy0157::happy0157: |
Anyone would get their feathers ruffled when they are told that their possessions are of lesser value than thought.
Folks will even on occasion refuse to believe verifiable data when presented and even go as far as to assume since they have no issues there must be no issues. Tom |
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
(Post 3778714)
If you don't like remington 700's fine, don't be spreadin half truths
rem uses a silver soldered on bolt handle, and the rear of the bolt has a bolt shroud in a sense 3 pieces but all bolt actions are and the rem is ported, ever notice the vent hole in the off side of the reciever? Remington recievers are made from bar stock, yep the same 4140 steel that most rifle makers use it just comes in a round form, and they use a CNC machine to machine the recievers out, just like howa, only howa has less waste using a square "Bar Stock" nothing wrong with the extractor except that on overloads a blown primer will damage the extractor. Remington barrels are turned and button rifled, howa's are "hammer forged" ya know what that means? they take square stock and run it through a hammer mill, which beats it round, then its drilled and button rifled, just like remingtons. I take my chances, buy remingtons just so I have an american made product where my money stays in america, and a lil bit of it goes into folk's pocket who are just like me, trying to make ends meet in a bad economy. If it doesn't suit me, I know a few american smiths who will make it a dream to shoot, maybe there is a better way but I prefer to feed my money to the money making machine that we know as the USA so keep your howa's and your tikka's, glad your happy with them. RR |
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
(Post 3778714)
If you don't like remington 700's fine, don't be spreadin half truths
rem uses a silver soldered on bolt handle, and the rear of the bolt has a bolt shroud in a sense 3 pieces but all bolt actions are and the rem is ported, ever notice the vent hole in the off side of the reciever? Remington recievers are made from bar stock, yep the same 4140 steel that most rifle makers use it just comes in a round form, and they use a CNC machine to machine the recievers out, just like howa, only howa has less waste using a square "Bar Stock" nothing wrong with the extractor except that on overloads a blown primer will damage the extractor. Remington barrels are turned and button rifled, howa's are "hammer forged" ya know what that means? they take square stock and run it through a hammer mill, which beats it round, then its drilled and button rifled, just like remingtons. I take my chances, buy remingtons just so I have an american made product where my money stays in america, and a lil bit of it goes into folk's pocket who are just like me, trying to make ends meet in a bad economy. If it doesn't suit me, I know a few american smiths who will make it a dream to shoot, maybe there is a better way but I prefer to feed my money to the money making machine that we know as the USA so keep your howa's and your tikka's, glad your happy with them. RR |
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
(Post 3778821)
ok, will give ya that one, care to argue the rest of my points?
RR Not what i say just what I read. Im no gunsmith, just learning things. |
Have you seen the gun poll? It doesnt look, its good by to Remington, looks to me like the Remington is the overall perfered rifle! Here you might want to lokk at it again.
Remington 940 32.71% Winchester 297 10.33% Weatherby 134 4.66% Savage 255 8.87% Browning 351 12.21% Ithaca 26 0.90% Beretta 38 1.32% Benelli 82 2.85% Federal 4 0.14% Ruger 270 9.39% Sako 134 4.66% Other 270 9.39% Thompson Center 73 2.54% Your beloved Weatherby happens to be one of the worst rated rifles by hunters on this forum. Remingtons are by far the most highly rated rifle here. There is wisdom in numbers. Seems to me you are a minority with your thoughts, zrexpilot |
Originally Posted by fritz1
(Post 3778899)
Have you seen the gun poll? It doesnt look, its good by to Remington, looks to me like the Remington is the overall perfered rifle! Here you might want to lokk at it again.
Remington 940 32.71% Winchester 297 10.33% Weatherby 134 4.66% Savage 255 8.87% Browning 351 12.21% Ithaca 26 0.90% Beretta 38 1.32% Benelli 82 2.85% Federal 4 0.14% Ruger 270 9.39% Sako 134 4.66% Other 270 9.39% Thompson Center 73 2.54% Your beloved Weatherby happens to be one of the worst rated rifles by hunters on this forum. Remingtons are by far the most highly rated rifle here. There is wisdom in numbers. Seems to me you are a minority with your thoughts, zrexpilot |
Originally Posted by hometheaterman
(Post 3778905)
People actually take stuff said on this site seriously when it comes to guns and scopes? That makes me laugh.
Bushnell 214 14.44% Leupold 600 40.49% Simmons 86 5.80% Tasco 46 3.10% Zeiss 122 8.23% Swaroski 76 5.13% Redfield 34 2.29% Weaver 26 1.75% other 278 18.76% |
How can any "poll" not have Marlin on the list of rifles and Nikon & Burris not on the list of scopes ?!?!
|
Originally Posted by Sheridan
(Post 3778922)
How can any "poll" not have Marlin on the list of rifles and Nikon & Burris not on the list of scopes ?!?!
|
Fritz,
I think you missed my point; if one was to made a list of rifles wouldn't one include Marlin before "others" ? That's all. Kinda like this; http://www.chuckhawks.com/rec_center...fle_brands.htm |
My 2-Cents, Ladies and Gents,
Remington is indeed capable of producing quality products, like my 1927 vintage M11-12ga. They are also quite capable and willing to market crap like the 710 and 770!!! They have an absolutely horrible reputation for customer service. Period. And I don't care if that fact makes you cry...To bad, so sad.:s8::s11: Ever wonder why you seldom see those expensive BROWNINGS on fire sales or discounted heavily? Simply stated, they don't have to, quality sells itself. I don't have a lot of experience with BROWNING'S customer service dept. I wonder why --- Not! Other quality Mfg's include TC and Ruger, yes ruger. And both of these companies offer outstanding customer service, legendary with customers as well as dealers / distributors.:hail: Want quality / accuracy right out of the box: SAVAGE. No surprise here, plenty of folks have stated this before on this site and others. And that's the way it is... Ever hear of the magazine "Gun-Tests"???:happy0001: Before you order your "Gun of your dreams", do your homework, figure out what you really want, what it will cost, add 25% and buy it from a real live gun shop, now there's an idea!!! And insist that they source the firearm and / or package ( scope , mounts, sling, case and all ) from DAVIDSON'S, a distributor that offers a lifetime guarantee above and beyond that of the manufacturers'. I wonder if WALMART / KMART / ANY-MART does that????.....:confused0024: I am a former Dealer / FFL and have a little experience in what I am spouting here... And as for the Wally world fans out there, knock yourselves out. I my opinion, WM is a great place to purchase under ware, tampons, motor oil, cheap tennis shoes. If you're going there to get a great firearm I hope you find it the first time around. Because that kid behind the sporting goods counter probably knows more about firearms and the like than you ever will, although he will likely have moved on to the produce dept. when you come back in for service after the SALE.:nonono2: Anyway, shoot more, shoot more often. God Bless America, gao |
Originally Posted by vtgao
(Post 3778945)
My 2-Cents, Ladies and Gents,
Ever wonder why you seldom see those expensive BROWNINGS [COLOR=black]on fire sales or discounted heavily? Simply stated, they don't have to, quality sells itself. I don't have a lot of experience with BROWNING'S customer service dept. I wonder why --- Not![/COLO Ever hear of the magazine "Gun-Tests"???:happy0001: Anyway, shoot more, shoot more often. God Bless America, gao As far as Magazine "Gun Test", Who do you think pays these magazines to test and promote there rifles?, The gun Manufactors! When was the last time you read a bad review on any gun? Just my two cents, not trying to start a arguement, just giving you someone elses poit of view. |
Originally Posted by fritz1
(Post 3778899)
Have you seen the gun poll? It doesnt look, its good by to Remington, looks to me like the Remington is the overall perfered rifle! Here you might want to lokk at it again.
Remington 940 32.71% Winchester 297 10.33% Weatherby 134 4.66% Savage 255 8.87% Browning 351 12.21% Ithaca 26 0.90% Beretta 38 1.32% Benelli 82 2.85% Federal 4 0.14% Ruger 270 9.39% Sako 134 4.66% Other 270 9.39% Thompson Center 73 2.54% Your beloved Weatherby happens to be one of the worst rated rifles by hunters on this forum. Remingtons are by far the most highly rated rifle here. There is wisdom in numbers. Seems to me you are a minority with your thoughts, zrexpilot Marketing. ever wonder why someone would pay 700.00 bucks for a break in half single shot. Advertising. |
Originally Posted by zrexpilot
(Post 3778982)
Marketing.
ever wonder why someone would pay 700.00 bucks for a break in half single shot. Advertising. |
Originally Posted by vtgao
(Post 3778945)
My 2-Cents, Ladies and Gents,
Remington is indeed capable of producing quality products, like my 1927 vintage M11-12ga. They are also quite capable and willing to market crap like the 710 and 770!!! They have an absolutely horrible reputation for customer service. Period. And I don't care if that fact makes you cry...To bad, so sad.:s8::s11: Ever wonder why you seldom see those expensive BROWNINGS on fire sales or discounted heavily? Simply stated, they don't have to, quality sells itself. I don't have a lot of experience with BROWNING'S customer service dept. I wonder why --- Not! Other quality Mfg's include TC and Ruger, yes ruger. And both of these companies offer outstanding customer service, legendary with customers as well as dealers / distributors.:hail: IMO ruger and TC are the most overrated brands out there . I owned a couple M77s and was not impressed with eithers accuracy, or fit/finsh, or rugers customer service. I sent a M77 back to them cause the trigger was like an 870s, they sent it back a month later "worked on", it was exactly the same. TC sidelock MLs are decent but the encore is a POS! My only experiences w/ remington customer service was trivial, but good. I bought a used 700 adl years ago w/ the rear sight missing I called up R and they just asked my for the ser.# and sent me a new one free. They also sent me a free mag plug too once. The nicest walnut stock I have ever bought was a 1100 trap model about 5 years ago, absolutely stunning shotgun , my 700 mtllss is the best looking, most accurate bolt action Ive ever owned. If you want to pay for a little more quality, remington offers that, if you want a 300$ tupperware/spraypainted POS, they offer that too, you chose, but dont whine when you get what you pay for cause you aint getting any better for the $ anywhere else. And as for the Wally world fans out there, knock yourselves out. I my opinion, |
Here are the results from another poll, from the "Shooters Forum", As you can see Remington once again comes out on top. Notice the trend there. Remingtons are not going anywhere, they are THE #1 rifle in the minds of hunters everywhere, believe it or not!
View Poll Results: Your favorite bolt action? Mauser 8 7.92% rugger m77 17 16.83% remington 700 25 24.75% howa/vangaurd 1 0.99% winchester model 70 17 16.83% savage 10 9.90% marlin 2 1.98% browning a or x bolt 6 5.94% 1903 springfield 4 3.96% other 15 14.85% |
Here is the link Sheridan posted. It still shows Remington on top! Go Figure!!!!
Recommended Centerfire Rifle Brands By the Guns and Shooting Online Staff One of the most frequent e-mail questions we get is, "What brand of hunting rifle should I buy?" In an effort to help I wrote, "Recommended Centerfire Hunting Rifles," which names the specific models that I personally prefer in a number of categories. But those recommendations are strictly my opinion. In order to get a wider range of opinions, I asked various members of the Guns and Shooting Online staff to name up to three of their favorite BRANDS of hunting rifles and here are the results. Note that each person's list is in alphabetical order, not order of preference. Alex Boughamer (Writer): Browning, Remington. Ann Decker (Office Assistant): Weatherby. Bob Fleck (Technical Assistant): Marlin, Savage, Weatherby. Jim Fleck (Chief Technical Assistant): Browning, Marlin, Weatherby. Glenn Harmaning (Writer): Marlin, Remington, Ruger. Terry Hart (Contributing Editor): CZ, H&R, T/C. Chuck Hawks (Managing Editor): Marlin, Weatherby, Winchester. Rocky Hays (Gunsmithing Consultant): Remington, T/C, Weatherby. Nathan Rauzon (Technical Assistant): Remington, Ruger, Savage. Jack Seeling (Technical Assistant): Marlin, Remington, Ruger. Carl Swanson (Writer): Browning, Marlin, Ruger. David Tong (Writer): CZ, Remington, Ruger. Randy Wakeman (Senior Contributing Editor): Browning, Ruger, Savage. Jon Y. Wolfe (Contributing Editor): Kimber. The results of this little survey of "experts" were more interesting and diverse than I expected. A total of 11 different brands were recommended. They ranged from what I would consider upscale brands (Weatherby, Kimber, Browning) to inexpensive (H&R). All are valid choices depending on budget and purpose. Clearly, different individuals had different ideas about price and value. Yet several respondents included both a relatively expensive and a more moderately priced brand on their list (Weatherby and Marlin, for example). Evidently, what was most important to them was "value"--getting a full measure of what you pay for--not price per se. For those who are interested in such things, here are the recommendation totals: Ruger - 6 Marlin - 6 Remington - 6 Weatherby - 5 Browning - 4 Savage - 3 CZ - 2 T/C - 2 Winchester - 1 Kimber - 1 H&R - 1 |
Originally Posted by zrexpilot
(Post 3778188)
I just like rustling the feathers of rem fans, they get sooooo defensive.
Carry on the rustling. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.