Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 Wood VS Synthetic??? >

Wood VS Synthetic???

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Wood VS Synthetic???

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-06-2008, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Colorado Luckydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntin' In Colorado
Posts: 2,910
Default Wood VS Synthetic???

I'm thinking about buying a couple of wood stocks for my Remington SPS 300 ultra mag and my Remington SPS .270. The stocks are described Rem 700 Deluxe ADL LA RH stocks s ". One of the stocks came off a 30.06, that is the one I will use on the 300. The other came off a .270 and obviously that is the one I'll use on my .270. Will these stocks fit properly, and will they improve the accuracy of the guns? I just wanted some of yall's advice before I pull the trigger and buy them. Any input will be very appreciated.

Thanks Bryan

Edit- I should add, both of the guns are shooting good already, I just like the looks of the wood better. Any added accuracy would also be a plus!
Colorado Luckydog is offline  
Old 10-06-2008, 07:04 PM
  #2  
 
Retaks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 2,313
Default RE: Wood VS Synthetic???

For the 270 either stock will be fine since a 270 and 30-06 are the same length action. The 300 Ultra Mag I think have a longer action due to the Ultra Mag cartridge so it wouldnt fit that one. I could be wrong though. Someone will be on ehre soon enough that will let you knwo for sure.
Retaks is offline  
Old 10-06-2008, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default RE: Wood VS Synthetic???

The 30-06 stock will fit your 300RUM action. A Remington LA is the same dimensionally regardless of what cartridge it may be chambered for. The only differences are in the feed lips and the magazine and the Ultra mag magazine is simply "cut out" for the larger case. If the feed lips were widerI could stuff my 338 RUM cartridges in my sons 30-06.

As far as accuracy goes,it is a shot in the dark. With a proper bedding job they could very well improve the accuracy of your rifles over the standard SPS plastic stockbut you never know until you try. You may have to experimentwith different loads again to find the one that it will like with the new stocks.

Apply several coats of a sealing finish to seal up the insideof the barrel channel and any other wood that is not already sealed or bedded to keep the wood from absorbing moisture. I absolutely love Permalyn finish, not only as a rock hard and beautiful stock finish but in the barrel channel as well.
http://www.brownells.com/aspx/ns/store/ProductDetail.aspx?p=7785&title=PERMALYN%20STO CK%20FINISH%20&%20SEALER

I say get the stocks. There were many a accurate rifles before plastic, kevlar, carbon, etc... were used to make rifle stocks. Wood is sooooooo much nicer than plastic on a rifle. Not that synthetic stocks don't have their place too.
bigbulls is offline  
Old 10-06-2008, 08:20 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Colorado Luckydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntin' In Colorado
Posts: 2,910
Default RE: Wood VS Synthetic???

Thanks BB! I'm gonna go ahead and make the deal with the guy!!!
Colorado Luckydog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
St.CroixFishing
Guns
14
12-04-2006 07:26 PM
BuckHarden
Guns
23
11-18-2006 05:29 PM
Deer-Slayer22
Guns
34
01-07-2005 08:51 PM
KonaBoy
Guns
12
11-21-2004 09:12 PM
Mykey
Guns
45
06-29-2003 12:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Wood VS Synthetic???


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.