Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

the so called cowboy rifles vs muzzle loaders

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-13-2007 | 12:45 PM
  #11  
D Rock's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: The Hoosier State
Default RE: the so called cowboy rifles vs muzzle loaders

Yes, all of those manufactures that you listed do produce rifles that fire pistol cartriges. I am not saying that they are not impossible to find, they just aren't as easy to come by as say the 30-30 which many people thought would be allowed.
D Rock is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2007 | 02:50 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 0
From: Blissfield MI USA
Default RE: the so called cowboy rifles vs muzzle loaders

I did a quick search on simple ballistics for some of these rounds and the only thing that comes really close is the .500 cartridges. They throw a similar bullet at velocities equal to an inline muzzle loader. As far as the normal options like a .357 or .44 mag in a carbine the inline muzzle loader or sabot slug gun would be better in the performance department. They can throw a bullet the same caliber or bigger that is heavier (almost twice in some cases) at higher velocities.

This is from the winchester catalog on their website.

44 mag rifle ballistics with a 240 grn Super X hollow soft point

Muzzle------ 1760 fps with 1650 ft/lbs of energy
100 yards--- 1362 fps with 988 ft/lbs of energy

With the winchester platinum tip 12 ga slug loads using a 50 cal 400 grn XTP style bullet it looks like this.

Muzzle-----1700 fps with 2566 ft/lbs of energy
100 yards--1420 fps with 1791 ft/lbs of energy

And there are more potent slug offerings than that.

And inline ML's fall somewhere in there as well, some a bit better, some a bit less. Depends on what you have and how you load it. My Remington 700 ML shoots a Precision Rifle lead bullet with a polymer tip that weighs 350 grns. I get around 1650-1700 fps out of it with 100-110 grn of clean shot (pioneer). And that is sort of weak compared to some other loadings. No where near a magnum charge. My bullets have a pretty good BC compared to most ML bullets or slug gun bullets though.

That being said I think a 44 mag in a carbine would be plenty for deer out to 100 yards, and I think it would be easier to shoot and find an accurate load for. Keep in mind these slugs I listed are near 15 bucks for 5 rounds!! And they kick waaaaaay more than a 44 mag.

If they legalize it in Michigan I might seriously consider looking into one. I have always wanted a 44 or .357 mag lever gun. This would be a good reason to get one.

My take on it anyway. Keep in mind I am not considering the oddball loads or hand loading. Just what your average guy would go down to the local guns store and purchase.

Paul






Paul L Mohr is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-2007 | 08:45 PM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
Default RE: the so called cowboy rifles vs muzzle loaders

I am not real sure where some of this information is coming from. I have been hunting with a 44 magnum, and other pistol caliber rifle's for years. The 454 can generate over 2300fps in a Puma lever action rifle. These rifles with a 240 grain(44 or 454) bullet can easily kill deer at 200 yards. Farther for the 454. Most BP shooter's are shooting 44 magnum bullets in their MZ!! The 44 magnum can easily attain 1800fps in a lever rifle with a 240 grain bullet.

People shoot 44 magnum pistol's over 100 yards?? Why would you believe a rifle is less capable?? People in Indiana are in for a real treat. If you want open sights then buy a Puma in 454. If you want a scope then buy a Marlin in 44 magnum. They will be very east to find.

I do not know if the 460S&W is legal, but if it is then imagine one in an Encore!! Man that would be a real hammer!! Or just get a 500S&W in an Encore, and hang on!!

Muzzle loader's and shotguns more effective. I do not think so!! Tom.
HEAD0001 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 04:19 AM
  #14  
D Rock's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: The Hoosier State
Default RE: the so called cowboy rifles vs muzzle loaders

For me there isn't a large benifit for someone to go out and buy one of these guns just for the 2 weeks of season you can use it. If a person is going to put their money into a new gun they might as well invest into a muzzleloader because you could use that one gun for both firearms season and muzzleloader season.I don't think it matters if you kill a deer with a pistol cartrige rifle or a muzzleloader because both will kill a deer at a distance you feel comfortable shooting at.
D Rock is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-2007 | 02:18 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default RE: the so called cowboy rifles vs muzzle loaders

Jim, wouldn't spend the money on one of these "cowboy rifles" unless you are just dieing to have one. My H & R Ultra Slughunter has worked great for me. I also like muzzleloaders, just like the ease of carrying a few slugs with me instead of a goody bag etc, for the muzzleloader. The shotgun is also a lot less finicky, always fires. Since you already have muzzleloaders, just use those would be my advice.
Follower is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$hooter
Black Powder
43
09-12-2014 08:30 AM
Semisane
Black Powder
26
08-29-2007 03:30 PM
gygoatman
Black Powder
6
05-17-2007 06:39 AM
Gordon Kahnke
Guns
0
11-29-2006 07:26 PM
SCbowhntr
Black Powder
6
08-29-2004 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.