Confused.........again.....
#1
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
I got to wondering about this the other day, and thought someone here may be able to enlighten me. I understand the "Pre-64" terminology for Winchester has to do with the point in time wher they changed the style of bolt action in Model 70's. This conversion is what basically makes the"Pre-64" more valuable to diehard fans and collectors.
My question is this: What does that have to do with Model 94's being aavertised as "Pre-64" also? What change(s) were made to it in 1964? Either I have forgotten what that was, or simply don't understand. Yes, I'm aware that subtle changes have occurred over the years as with most everyone else, but what separates a 1963 '94 from a 1965 '94?
My question is this: What does that have to do with Model 94's being aavertised as "Pre-64" also? What change(s) were made to it in 1964? Either I have forgotten what that was, or simply don't understand. Yes, I'm aware that subtle changes have occurred over the years as with most everyone else, but what separates a 1963 '94 from a 1965 '94?
#2
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From:
i think;
winchester guns were hand fitted and polished b4 1964, and solid pins were used in the reciever/trigger construction as oppossed to roll pins.
also there may have been several QC inspections at various machining operations that were lessened or droped fer cost effectiveness.
i think
early
winchester guns were hand fitted and polished b4 1964, and solid pins were used in the reciever/trigger construction as oppossed to roll pins.
also there may have been several QC inspections at various machining operations that were lessened or droped fer cost effectiveness.
i think
early
#3
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 3
From: west central wi USA
Prior to '64. All Winchester guns were generally made from solid steel parts, machined and fitted to the individual rifle. The quality of the guns was almost what you would get in a custom rifle today. After '64, the designs were modified to use more cheaply manufactured stamped parts. To save labor costs, the fit and finish also declined. Racking the lever of a post '64 rifle sounded like a BB gun. Shooters felt betrayed.
#4
ORIGINAL: Wingbone
Prior to '64. All Winchester guns were generally made from solid steel parts, machined and fitted to the individual rifle. The quality of the guns was almost what you would get in a custom rifle today. After '64, the designs were modified to use more cheaply manufactured stamped parts. To save labor costs, the fit and finish also declined. Racking the lever of a post '64 rifle sounded like a BB gun. Shooters felt betrayed.
Prior to '64. All Winchester guns were generally made from solid steel parts, machined and fitted to the individual rifle. The quality of the guns was almost what you would get in a custom rifle today. After '64, the designs were modified to use more cheaply manufactured stamped parts. To save labor costs, the fit and finish also declined. Racking the lever of a post '64 rifle sounded like a BB gun. Shooters felt betrayed.
#5
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Well, thanks to those who took the time to refresh my memory. I guess I just got lost in all the Model 70 "Pre-64" hype that I forgot about how the other models suffered also.
By the way...I attended a local auction yesterday that had several guns for sale, one being a Model 94 30-30. A serial no. check indicated it was made in 1952, and was in nice condition, probably in the neighborhood of 95%. The new owner took it home for $275.00. I thought the price was a tad high, but the condition may have warranted it. What do you all think?
By the way...I attended a local auction yesterday that had several guns for sale, one being a Model 94 30-30. A serial no. check indicated it was made in 1952, and was in nice condition, probably in the neighborhood of 95%. The new owner took it home for $275.00. I thought the price was a tad high, but the condition may have warranted it. What do you all think?




