duckdog132

i have a burris fulfield 3-9x40 that im putting on my savage model 12 308. what rings and base should i get. and should i get high rings or low?. i want a good mount and rings but i dont need the over kill which will cost me a arm and a leg but also i dont want junk.. what are your thoughts?
also should i go two peice or one on the mounts?

robs archery

leupold base and ringsmed height a little more money but well worth it or
weaver bases and a set of millet rings

Pawildman

I feel that you want to keep the objective end of the scope as close to the barrel as possible without touching it. This helps keep the line of sight close to the bore line. I have used Leupold and/or Redfield mounts and rings almost exclusively for years and never had any regrets. The rings come in various heights for different applications. Yeah, they cost a little more, but are worth it in my opinion.

Duckbutter48

With a 40mm non-AO scope you can prob use the low rings with no probs.

duckdog132

should i go with a one peice mount or two peice?

bigbulls

Warne maxima rings and bases. Strongest and most cosistant set up you are likely to find and still not break your pocket book. They are a two piece, Weaver style base which, IMHO, is stronger and looks much better than a one piece base.

You should be able to use a low ring with the FF-II scope. I have one mounted on a Remington 700 and another on a Howa and both use low rings with about 1/16th of an inch clearance.

duckdog132

where is the cheapest place you have found to order those big bulls?

duckdog132

?

bigbulls

Be patient grass hopper.

You can get these rings and bases form Midwayusa.com...... $20 for a set of bases and $27.50 for 1" matte rings.

duckdog132

HAHA BIGBULLS. I JUST DIDNT WANT IT TO GO TO THE SECOND PAGE BEFORE YOU GOT A CHANCE TO VOICE YOUR WONDERFUL OPINION.LOL
THANKS I WILL TRY THERE