Rifle question?
#21
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Rifle question?
Its because its not a bad rifle. Its the shooter
It is not the shooter that is responsible for the 710 action to be so rough that it feels like it is full of gravel.
I personally feel that remington would have been far better off to bring back the 788 instead of introducing the 710.
#22
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mobile, alabama
Posts: 430
RE: Rifle question?
stubblejumper,
Man, I've had some 788's that were awesome shooters. You run across a dud every now and then but most of the 788's I've seen were well built and good shooters. I have no use for 710's other than as an inferior boat anchor.
Man, I've had some 788's that were awesome shooters. You run across a dud every now and then but most of the 788's I've seen were well built and good shooters. I have no use for 710's other than as an inferior boat anchor.
#23
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 306
RE: Rifle question?
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
I am not defending the 710.My statement meant that anyone that would buy a 710 to save a few dollars would never spend money to have one reblued.I personally think the 700 is a total waste of money in the first place.
I am not defending the 710.My statement meant that anyone that would buy a 710 to save a few dollars would never spend money to have one reblued.I personally think the 700 is a total waste of money in the first place.
#24
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Rifle question?
Why is the 700 a total waste of money
#27
RE: Rifle question?
I personally like Winchesters,But it is hard to beat a Savage out of the box.I would save my coins untill I saw something that i really liked then get that one.As far as caliber for the game you mentioned the 25.06,7 mm-08,would work nicely..JMHO