HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   please tell me just one negative to crossbows (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/94171-please-tell-me-just-one-negative-crossbows.html)

ELKINMTCWB 03-29-2005 04:43 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 
datamax
compounds did not change bowhunting. Let me gess there is no more deer killed with bows now then befor stick bows. I do not think you are right at all there.the compound did make a big change.


datamax plz tell us the real reasion,you are pussing this.

buckmaster9
asking crossbows have been legal in ohio for 30 years?

If so I would like to know the nifrance in numbers on crossbows to compounds and stick if you know them.

Just so you know my uncle is a pice of crap!!! in his 15 yers bow hunting he mite get 1 deer every 2 years. Two years ago he changed to a crossbow. This year he killed 11 deer. I know his hunting skills did not improve. From my point of veiw the cross bow is in no way like a compound or he would only have killed 1 deer this year.

Buckmaster9 03-29-2005 05:02 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 
Compounds were marketed to people who didn't want to learn how to master the finger release, train for months to hold a man's weight bow and align your string without a peep. Your point is? In states where crossbows are not usually accessible, compounds are the easiest ticket to archery season.


1st off most people now days do use a range finder with a crossbow you will surly have the time.
You can do this with a compound.


2nd off a 10 to 12 in goup at 100 yards is about 4 tims the avrage compoud shooters range.
This isn’t true.


3rd you can do away with the compound. I will gladly shoot my stick bow!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why do this?


4th compounds did change bow hunting and crossbows will only make is worse.
It hasn’t changed anything; you still have your stick bow.


5th if you beleave this i am turly sorry
If you cannot hold a bow for at least a minute it isn’t for you. I can hold the Concept99 forever.


buckmaster9
asking crossbows have been legal in ohio for 30 years?
Since 1976.


If so I would like to know the nifrance in numbers on crossbows to compounds and stick if you know them.
Go here.

No one has even tried to prove that a crossbow has a greater range, greater rate of fire, greater accuracy or greater predicted harvest rate than a compound bow.

Before the beginning of the compound, very few archers would have taken shots beyond 15 perhaps 20 yards.

Now with the compound, 40, 50 and 60 yard shots are not that unusual.

mammasboy 03-29-2005 05:05 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 
O.K. I've read every post and feel the need to jump in. Crossbows are "on average" not as accurate as compounds and I would have no problem if they were allowed during archery season. (And yes, I have shot the Ten Point, it's a great crossbow, but not nearly as accurate as a compound.) Man this thread is long!:D

aeroslinger 03-29-2005 05:58 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 
From the Texas Parks and Wildlife Outdoor Annual:

"Longbows, compound bows, or recurved bows:
- must have a 40 pound minimum draw at the time of hunting, when used to hunt turkey and all game anumals other than squirrel.
- that are equipped with a device that allows the bow to be locked at full or partial draw are lawful during any season when lawful archery equipment may be used.

Crossbow
Any person may use a crossbow to hunt game animals or game birds (except migratory game birds) during a general open season or Eastern spring turkey season. Telescopic sights are lawful.
ONLY a person with an upper-limb disability may use a crossbow to hunt deer and turkey during the Archery Only Open Season, provided the person, while hunting, has in their immediate possession a physician's statement certifiying the extent of the disability."

Seems like anyone wanting to hunt with a crossbow, at least in Texas, is free to do so. By the way, archery season here runs roughly from the first of October to the end of October while the general season, which is open to crossbow hunters, is from roughly the first of November to the first of January with a lot of counties having about a 2 week extended season for does and spikes. Seems plenty sensible and fair. By the way, those 2 fine young hunters could have taken those deer just as easily with a rifle as they did with a crossbow but they couldn't with a recurve OR crossbow.

silentassassin 03-29-2005 05:59 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

If crossbows are so junk and they cant shoot as far as a compound THEN plz tell me what there is to gain?

exactly there is no benfit so why not allow them.



More hunters hunting is not all that great of a deal. Allready you have to have privet land or try to find an out of the way place to hunt.With more hunters it will only get worse.
At least your honest. You don't want them in because you are greedy. Like I have said continually, when your hunting rights start being taken away I want you to stop and think back about his conversation and remember that we tried to tell you how there was strength in numbers and the more hunters involved in the sprt the better off we would be.


Like I said they ones that push the crossbow have SOME THING TO GAIN,90% of the time it will be money not to help hunting as a hole.

well I guess I am in the 10% because I certainly don't have anything to gain except more in hunters in the sport I love to help vote people in that will look out for my hunting interests.


Do you think it might make a difference in the impact for a state who only has nine days vs a state that has a month for gun hunters?
I don't think so considering I live in an area that is a couple hundred sqaure miles that only has 4 days of gun season per year.


Please get off the "it worked in three states it will work everywhere" kick? It lacks substance!
I will if you will get off of the "it's be an overwhelming success everywhere they have tried it so it couldn't possibly work here:eek:" kick;)


I think you are full of it! If you had not any thing to gain you would not shove it down the throt for the rest of the bowhunters
You have a crossbow that kills deer consistently at 100+ yards and data is the one that's full of it:eek:[&:][8D]


Peopel do not push things for no reasion tell us all the real reasion you are pushing it and maby you may get more suport.

Let me say it again real slow. Because I have witnessed the non-impact and I want everyone to be able to enjoy the bowseason and I want as many bowhunters as possible on my side at election time.

MNRut 03-29-2005 06:18 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

quote:

I fear that they will attract hunters who do not take the time to get to know their weapons limitations. A lot of gun hunters who only pick up their rifle or shotgun during hunting season will see crossbows as a way around all of the practice that goes into hunting with a compund.

A valid concern however its never happened before in AR, OH and GA, has it ? No more so than slob compound shooters, slob recurve shooters and slob gun hunters. Its a wives tale fear - its not reality.
Data,
How do you know it hasn't happened in those states. I'd like to see your statistics on the percentage of "slob" hunters in each weapon category. You can't show me these stats because they don't exist. However, I guarantee that there is a greater number of lost deer per hunter for those using crossbows than those using compounds.


Nor compounds. Geeez man, just go back to October and November right here on this forum and read all the "I missed" threads and " I bloodied one" threads.

All compounder shooters buddy
I'm not arguing that deer are not lost by those using compounds - I do however believe that a higher ratio of deer lost per hunter exists among crossbow users. Of course, I am basing this on info that you yourself provided about the effectiveness of the crossbow versus compounds.:eek:

I think making another season for crossbows is yet another bad idea. Maybe, I should invent another weapon and we can make a season for that. It's just more stress on our Conservation officers who are already spread too thin.

silentassassin 03-29-2005 06:30 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

However, I guarantee that there is a greater number of lost deer per hunter for those using crossbows than those using compounds.
OK well show me the stats to back it up. I have both lived in area where they are legal and I don't have any reason to believe that.

datamax 03-29-2005 06:35 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

compounds did not change bowhunting.
you did NOT just say that with a straight face did you ? OMG !!!!!!!!! I really .... don't know how to respond to that. Its like saying the automobile didn't change travel that much !


datamax plz tell us the real reasion,you are pussing this.
The real reason is I see a highly flawed argument against crossbows and I love to debate highly flawed arguments.



Seems like anyone wanting to hunt with a crossbow, at least in Texas, is free to do so.
OMG - say it IS NOT TRUE !! Texas deer herds will be slaughtered, there'll be so many people using them they'll cut the seasons - it will obviously RUIN deer hunting there in archery season !

What ? You mean its been like that for years ? Why ......... and no negative effects ?

What say you anti-crossbow zealots to Texas ??


O.K. I've read every post and feel the need to jump in
you are a braver soul than I !


Data,
How do you know it hasn't happened in those states. I'd like to see your statistics on the percentage of "slob" hunters in each weapon category. You can't show me these stats because they don't exist. However, I guarantee that there is a greater number of lost deer per hunter for those using crossbows than those using compounds.

Awe, geeeeez man, I LIVE here - I think I know how crossbows impact my state ! Most slob hunters I run across are compounders - by far.


Of course, I am basing this on info that you yourself provided about the effectiveness of the crossbow versus compounds
Okay, explain that logic. I'll sit back on this one because your conclusion baffles me.

MNRut 03-29-2005 06:39 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 
I don't have stats and will admit that.

I am basing it on the fact that the xbow has been deemed by you, data and others as a less effective weapon than the compound yet many people out there believe it to be much more effective. This overestimation will lead to greater numbers of lost deer.

MNRut 03-29-2005 06:44 PM

RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows
 

Okay, explain that logic. I'll sit back on this one because your conclusion baffles me.
You claim that the xbow is less effective than a compound, yet there seem to be a majority who believe the xbow is infact more effective.

If you are correct in your claim that the xbow is less effective (which I don't doubt you are), these people that think it is more effective are going to pick one up under these false assumptions and end up taking shots at deer from distances beyond the xbow's effective range. Result: wounded deer.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.