buckeye

I just got home from having him scored by an official scorer (Roger Davis) of P&Y, B&C, Buckmasters and Buckeye Big Buck Club.

Here is what he came up with.

160 6/8 GROSS Non-Typical
156 3/8 NET Non-Typical

152 3/8 Gross Typical
135 3/8 Net Typical

So he will make P&Y both as a Non-Typical or Typical. I will most likely choose Non-Typical if I indeed enter it. Not sure on that yet.

So to everyone who either "just didn't see it", questioned me or just flat out called me a liar here is the proof you asked for. What bothered me was not that my buck didn't live up to what they may have thought a 160 class buck looks like, but rather some of them, not all of them but some trying to flat out call me a cheater and a liar.


*Names edited out* Sorry if I offended you.



ROB could you please alter my contest entry to 160 6/8 please. Thank you[8D]

OH, by the way I was only 3/8's of an inch off when I scored it. Not to shabby eh?

BowHuntingFool

Once again congrats on a fine buck!!!!!!

Tribal

Nice, Buckeye congrats. One question though. My buck last year could have been entered either way also. They told me you will get a higher score going typical than non typical. Did thet say anything about that to you?

cardeer

Yes nice buck

buckeye

Tribal

He didn't say anything like that to me. He was a super nice guy though. He just explained me my options and offered me some suggestions.

Kelly/KY

Way to go Justin...

He's one heck of a buck and I'm sure made your season one to remember. Nice to make it official. Congrats.

Kelly

BOWFANATIC

I apologized more than once! Seeing as you just cant seem to get over it and you felt the need to call everyone out who questioned the score , you can kiss my arse!
How many times are you going to bring this back up?

atlasman

Buckeye...........How old are you?? I can't even believe you would post something this childish. Calling out people by name is not only in poor taste, it also makes you look very juvenile.

#1 Most if not all those guys said your buck was a great deer. That should be all you ever need to hear.........sadly it's obvious you need more then that.

#2 Anyone that thinks you were lying could easily STILL think you are lying now. Just because you say some Official agreed with you means nothing to anyone who wasn't there. You could be making that up too. Not saying you are but why do you think your word would be good now with people that didn't accept it before??

#3 Holy Sh!t..........I just looked at the list again and saw that I am on it .........I never said anything about your buck except that I thought others looked bigger.


You have some SERIOUS issues to work out buddy. I think it will probably be a VERY LONG TIME before the members of this board forget a post like this.

If I were you I would sit down..........read your post again and think hoe it must read from others perspective.

Then decide how you are gonna make it "right" with all the people you just spit on.


You have lost a TREMENDOUS amount of respect from me.

Antler Eater

Very fine buck indeed... Congratulations again, those kind don't walk by everyday!!

Great pic too!!!

As far as the P&Y ranking issue... I don't have their latest edition at this time but I do have the 1999 fifth addition so these numbers obviously have been increased. To give you a "ball park" idea of where you would fall if you should decide to enter.

As you know, for Whitetails it takes a minimum of 125 NET inches to qualify in the Typical Catagory. In the 1999 Fifth edition there were 18,510 people listed who qualified and entered in the Typical catagory. 135 3/8 would tie you with 76 other people for 10,056th place.

In the Non-Typical catagory it takes a minimum of 150 net inches to qualify. Again in the 1999 Fifth Edition there were 1139 people listed who qualified and entered. 156 3/8 would tie you with 3 people for 1083rd place.

As far as having a "higher score" in one catagory than the other, looks like 6 of 1 and a half dozen of the other to me.....

buckeye

It was poor taste on some of their parts calling me out, but you say nothing about that. Why is that?

Once again it has nothing to do with the deer, its score or anything like that. But rather a couple on the list, not all, who in jist called me a liar and a cheater.

Atlas and bowfanatic I don't have a problem with you or anyone else on this site as I have said many times. As I said before I enjoy your guys posts. When Bowfanatic was all over me you said nothing, but you are fast to defend him where he needs not to be defended. AS you can see in my post, I was not rude to anyone.

No offical agreed with me. He scored it and that is what it is. Call Roger Davis if you would like. I should have paper work back from P&Y if I enter it within a months time.

I spit on no one as you said I did. Maybe go back and read brownings post to me if you want to see someone get "spit" on. BTW I just reread my post and I see no personal attacks. I listed the names of a few members.

*Names edited out* Once again sorry if I offended you.


None of you 5 were rude to me. You guys just said you didnt see it or did not agree with me.

browning_1 was rather on the rude side.

Bowfanatic and I had our little go around and settled it in PM. Or I thought we did. Maybe not after reading his post?? Anyhow, I was not rude or personally attack anyone in this thread so there is no reason to get worked up over it.


Some of you guys were quite respectful when you questioned me. As I was respectful back to you guys then and now.

I don't understand the problem here.

*EDIT*

*Atlas I am 24 years old*