Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

D-Loop Advice for 82nd Airborne owners

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-04-2008 | 09:54 PM
  #71  
TFOX's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
Default RE: D-Loop Advice for 82nd Airborne owners

Mine is long for my bt release and anchors to hit properly.

I have been known to adjust my draw length and/or loop to get whatever release I am using at the time to fit correctly.

I have had them so short you couldn't hardly get a caliper release in it but my short & sweet would slip right in.
TFOX is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-2008 | 09:58 PM
  #72  
TFOX's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
Default RE: D-Loop Advice for 82nd Airborne owners

ORIGINAL: badger109

ORIGINAL: TFOX

My question is are you setting the loop up so that it is straight back before you start drawing or are you trying to turn the string with the loop to get the peep to align?


I set mine up so that my loop is straight and the peep is almost straight and my loop will twist if I try to by hand but since everything is pulling in a straight line,I don't have issues with it turning on me.I also don't tie a loop over and under,mine is below the nock.


BUT,I agree,I have used the bcy and it does not move once tied.


Like this



doesnt that defeat the idea of a string loop? (that is eliminating nock pinch)
Not at all.The release will not be pushing up against the arrow,which is where the pinch comes from.There is still no serving wear.I can adjust it for my draw length/release preferences and I get valuable down pressure to ensure a constant pressure down instead of worrying about the arrow wanting to float on the rest.
TFOX is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2008 | 05:25 AM
  #73  
kwilson16's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Burke, VA (raised in MD)
Default RE: D-Loop Advice for 82nd Airborne owners

Have you tried re-serving the string? If this did not help, you could eliminate slippery serving material as a cause.
kwilson16 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2008 | 05:49 AM
  #74  
GMMAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: D-Loop Advice for 82nd Airborne owners

Have you tried re-serving the string? If this did not help, you could eliminate slippery serving material as a cause.
Believe me....this will be the next thing that happens if the BCY doesn't solve the problem. I have confidence it's "over"!
GMMAT is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2008 | 06:53 AM
  #75  
BruceW63's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: D-Loop Advice for 82nd Airborne owners

First off, I recognize that I'm new to this forum. Enough said on that.
Second, I don't own an 82nd Airborne, but I do own a Marquis and I think it's similar enough to apply here, because
Third, I had this same problem with the Marquis --- my loop would "dance" around the string every couple of shots. Not always, but enough to be extremely aggrivating.
I solved the problem by putting a dab of BARGE cement on the knots and made sure it got down to the string by using a toothpick to force it down in there. I like BARGE because it's "semi permanent" and doubt that it will weaken the material.
Fourth, it's my opinion (after some thoughtful study) that this problem, and some others, are brought about by the Bowtech "Short Stop" and it's very close proximity to the nocking point. High amount of energy brought to a crashing halt = transmission of that energy to anything available, such as immediately within the string, beginning at the point of abrupt stop and then working outward from there. The first add-on that it's going to encounter is the D-loop and/or nock point, and the energy will go where it wants to go and exploit anything it can in order to dissipate itself. I figure a D-loop is no different than a string silencer, in that regard - and happens to be the closest one to the point of impact. So it vibrates and dances.
Fifth, I "get" the concept of the SS's location, from a pure physics standpoint it makes sense - but whether or not all of the downside considerations were weighed before putting the product to market - who knows. As far as I know or understand, this is a "brand new" idea for Bowtech, and I'll allow that there's a learning process involved that has to extend beyond the factory and a few test markets, that the more exposure their products get the more different, uncontrolled experiences that will be encountered and there will be complaints and criticisms. That's just a part of manufacturing and product development, and I "get" that, too.

I guess what will remain to be seen is whether or not Bowtech is listening, hearing and understanding - and will take appropriate steps such as releasing a series of "white papers" to their regional reps and dealers. I think there are a lot of similar concerns which are arising as more and more of their new product line gets in the hands of their customers. In my opinion, they should have a forum on their website where concerns can be raised, and solutions shared.
BruceW63 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
varmicon_qa
Archery Gear
0
04-07-2009 05:41 PM
Matt/NC
Bowhunting
15
11-12-2008 07:15 PM
wahoohunter
Bowhunting
7
09-05-2008 09:39 PM
MartinMan09
Bowhunting
7
01-27-2008 04:02 PM
mystryak
Technical
8
01-21-2008 12:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.