Guardian V. 82nd Airborne V. 101 Airborne
09-05-2008, 09:22 PM
#5
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: charlottesville, virginia
Posts: 1,732
RE: Guardian V. 82nd Airborne V. 101 Airborne
hey guys, sorry for the lack of info there in the first post. My draw length is about 28.5-29 inches and poundage is around 65...the primary use, well only use actually, will be for hunting
09-05-2008, 09:26 PM
#6
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hughesville, PA
Posts: 2,590
RE: Guardian V. 82nd Airborne V. 101 Airborne
Out of those three I suggest the guardian. You are gonna get enough speed, stability, and get it in a package that is not too short, but not too long.
I own the 101 and love it, will be hunting with it. You really can't go wrong with it either.
I own the 101 and love it, will be hunting with it. You really can't go wrong with it either.
09-05-2008, 09:31 PM
#7
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Henderson, KY
Posts: 1,760
RE: Guardian V. 82nd Airborne V. 101 Airborne
theyre all great bows. the 82nd will be the hardest to shoot as far as in the specs of the bows. the 101st would be a better hunting only bow out of the twoimo. the guardian is an amazing bow that is GREAT all around. shoot them all, also take a look at the general and the allegience.
09-05-2008, 09:39 PM
#8
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 253
RE: Guardian V. 82nd Airborne V. 101 Airborne
All three are great bows, and as mentioned, could vary based on use and draw length.
I would have to say though that the Guardian is the flagship and the more technologically advanced. For a junkie like me, always a good thing.
I would have to say though that the Guardian is the flagship and the more technologically advanced. For a junkie like me, always a good thing.
