scentlok lawsuit???
12-10-2007, 10:12 AM
#61
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 9,626
RE: scentlok lawsuit???
Ifit could be shown scientifically that it worked, it would be a different story.
========================================
It does to some degree depend upon what you mean by "worked."
Try this:
Take some ammonia and put it in a film container. Cover it with ordinary cotton cloth and take a big wiff.
Next cover it with a piece of carbon-laced material and do the same...and then tell me there is zero difference.
I do not think that you can "eliminate" all human scent with a garment of any type, period. But I do think that human scent is like a radio playing in the woods. You cannot turn it off, but you can most certainly turn it down.
12-10-2007, 10:14 AM
#62
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: scentlok lawsuit???
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
Yes. I view gun kills with less admiration than bow kills.
Yes. I view gun kills with less admiration than bow kills.
Have you ever gun hunted for deer?
I "believe" the name of the thread in question was "Bowkills are easier". Post that in a bowhunting forum and .....well....you know.
I am curious as to how yours would stach up against the guy saying SL works. So...I guess I did. But....now that you've told me that the SL scientist is a quack and is guilty of fraud......I guess it's a moot point.
I have a better idea.............since you are chirping so loud against me why don't WE compare scientific credentials and see who is "full of ****"
I am exiting. Fight amongst yourselves!
LOL...Me either!
2.6+ of that.....but close enough for an 80-s shooter!
12-10-2007, 10:18 AM
#66
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Lima Ohio & Clarion Pa
Posts: 6,453
RE: scentlok lawsuit???
ORIGINAL: Germ
Jim now that is the best post you have ever made
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
Just think of all that good deer habitat that is now being wastedon golf courses.
Just think of all that good deer habitat that is now being wastedon golf courses.
12-10-2007, 10:25 AM
#67
Fork Horn
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salisbury, NC
Posts: 277
RE: scentlok lawsuit???
Even if all this arguement is entertaining to read, is it really worth it to argue how somebody else hunts? scent-lock or not, bow or gun, do what YOU are confident with and what works for you. After all anything that helps you be more confident in yourself and your equipment helps and works IMHO.
12-10-2007, 10:37 AM
#68
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 13,082
RE: scentlok lawsuit???
ORIGINAL: mobow
atlas, can you provide a link or documentation to substantiate this? If so, can you also show that Scent Lok or Scent Blocker is one that paid them to falsify results? I don't ask that to be contradictory, if you can I'll sell my suit. Just that simple.
Note that I said paid to FALSIFY the results. Not paid to CONDUCT the test. Thank you.
ORIGINAL: atlasman
You mean the lab that was fined millions of dollars for falsifying results for clients who paid them to do "tests"??
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
The guys from the independent lab that tested the scent-lok.
The guys from the independent lab that tested the scent-lok.
You mean the lab that was fined millions of dollars for falsifying results for clients who paid them to do "tests"??
Note that I said paid to FALSIFY the results. Not paid to CONDUCT the test. Thank you.
12-10-2007, 10:42 AM
#70
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: scentlok lawsuit???
ORIGINAL: mobow
ORIGINAL: mobow
atlas, can you provide a link or documentation to substantiate this? If so, can you also show that Scent Lok or Scent Blocker is one that paid them to falsify results? I don't ask that to be contradictory, if you can I'll sell my suit. Just that simple.
Note that I said paid to FALSIFY the results. Not paid to CONDUCT the test. Thank you.
ORIGINAL: atlasman
You mean the lab that was fined millions of dollars for falsifying results for clients who paid them to do "tests"??
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
The guys from the independent lab that tested the scent-lok.
The guys from the independent lab that tested the scent-lok.
You mean the lab that was fined millions of dollars for falsifying results for clients who paid them to do "tests"??
Note that I said paid to FALSIFY the results. Not paid to CONDUCT the test. Thank you.
Sorry mobo.............I NEVER said SL paid to falsify results. Only that Intertek Testing facilities had been fined for doing it.
It is public record and a google search will show many results........here is one.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/963707f9ea3c005d85257359003d480a/d1e4c1a5259d474885256b6800670b01!OpenDocument