atlas, can you provide a link or documentation to substantiate this? If so, can you also show that Scent Lok or Scent Blocker is one that paid them to falsify results? I don't ask that to be contradictory, if you can I'll sell my suit. Just that simple.

Note that I said paid to FALSIFY the results. Not paid to CONDUCT the test. Thank you.

i generally shoot wilson ball's (i have access to them real cheap), but have tried the pro-v1's... best ball i've ever used... but i'm not gonna buy 'em cuz the problem with my golf game is at the other end of the club and no ball, regardless of how expensive it is, will make me a better golfer...

Plea to Atlasman

I need that lucky shirt This is all pointless, just sent me some fibers

Did you read "disparaging"??? That's weird because I never wrote it. I said "lame or easy"........you have voiced the opinion MANY times in the past (as have others, no big deal) that they view gun kills with less admiration then bow kills..........it seems odd to me that you can have this opinion having NEVER done one and just started doing the other. You also said you are amazed at those who voice an opinion about scent lok even though they don't use it and others who do like it...........sounds like the same thing to me. How can you be amazed by something.............yet be guilty of doing it yourself.


I believe he was comparing gun kills during gun season with bow kills during bow season.


Who questioned my credentials??



There is nothing wrong with that.............in fact I find it is quite common in carbon suit owners

Actually I think the people that brought the suit all owned the suits. I owned the liner and didn't feel it aided my hunting. Good ole Baking soda works and you can reactivate by resoaking your clothes in it.

The liner actually was a pain in the early season because it made me sweat more.

Funny how "pro's" wearing this stufff constantly freak when a deer/elk gets down wind of them and winds them on film.

Considering I shoot low-mid 80's and I'm sure you were near scratch looks like we both shot about the same under our average.




I guess we do have something in common.............neither one of us could cut it on the PGA tour.........course I never tried

I love watching grown men bicker (did I spell that correctly?) about silly things like the clothes they wear in the woods.

None of you can ever hassle a womanabout being indecisive over which shoes to wear....ever again.

Yes. I view gun kills with less admiration than bow kills. I'm not ashamed of that opinion. I've gun hunted my whole life. I never touched a bow until I was 40 yrs old. I took two turkeys with a shotgun during the late 90's. I took one with my bow, this past Spring. NO COMPARISON in my eyes.....but that's just my opinion (again....that I'm not ashamed of).

I "believe" the name of the thread in question was "Bowkills are easier". Post that in a bowhunting forum and .....well....you know.

I am curious as to how yours would stach up against the guy saying SL works. So...I guess I did. But....now that you've told me that the SL scientist is a quack and is guilty of fraud......I guess it's a moot point.

I am exiting. Fight amongst yourselves!

LOL...Me either!

2.6+ of that.....but close enough for an 80-s shooter!

And good scores will countinue to be shot with both balls.. The point is who cares....The same as Who cares what camo you wear. If it works for you or makes you fell like you have an edge. Than it's worth it's weight!

If you smart enough not to be "duped" than good for you..you can laugh at us that buy it. Why would you care what I wear!

By now everyone has chosen a side..argue now or argue next month..it's the same thing Atlas says it doesn't work. Jeff feels any benefit is worth it because besides the scentlok feature..it's damn fine camo..

And then there are all the rest who chime in ...who cares..???

Just think of all that good deer habitat that is now being wastedon golf courses.