It's pointless. If anyone says it works......they're either in the pocket of scent-lok.....or a quack.

OK.....whatever you say. If God told you it worked you'd swear he was wearing Robinson. Oh....I forgot....no scientific evidence. Who's God?

I'm out.

Youworked....cant say for sure if it was the clothing and cant say it wasnt.Too many variables and no way to prove it without a time machine [&:]

Im not willing to plunk down money on something thats a gimmick. Ifit could be shown scientifically that it worked, it would be a different story.

Something about flossing cat teeth comes to mind............as well as a 8-10 page argument when buck magnet said bow kills were easier.


You said you were wearing scent lok when you killed your bucks......."dispell that"............well I was wearing the same sweatshirt when I killed mine........"dispell that" What you are implying is that one had something to do with the other.........if that were true I should be able to make the same claims about my sweatshirt that you do about your garments of choice.


One of us is getting paid to say what we said..........your complete ignorance of science keeps you from understanding anything else I would say so no sense wasting bandwidth.

And just think ~ with the off season right around the corner we can have months and months of these conversations....

Kinda like every Golf ball claims to be the Longest.

Those who can't afford Titleist Pro V1's usually say they are not all what they are advertised either [:-].

What I would like to see just ONCE.........is someone who "says" or "believes" or has "faith" that it works actually offer even one tiny shred of proof that it does..............instead all we ever hear is "This one time, at bandcamp" stories


I "say" my sweatshirt works.............many people have "said" that cardeer necklaces work.

You think dead down wind will get sued for it's claim that a detergent can reactivate these carbon suits?

I would rather floss my neighbors cat's teeth.....than hunt with a rifle. How's that disparaging to gun hunters? It's a personal opinion. Nothing agaisnt gun hunting.....nor cat teeth flossing.

Take a gun or a bow on any given day of deer season. Which is easier to kill a deer with? Now you don't need to be a freakin scientist to know the answer to this one.

So when your credentials are called into question....I am suddenly inflicted with a "complete ignorance of science".

Heeeeeeee's BAck!!

Honestly.....what good does it do to ask for proof.....when all you're gonna do is call the guy offering the proof a quack or a sell-out? What's the point?

I shot 74 once...............with a Top Flight MAGNA that I found the round before

Who can't afford golf balls?

And I shot 66 a FEW times with a PROV1.

"Correllation" or "Causation"?

And keep practicing, Atlas. 74 isn't that terrible!

I don't know that this has an answer and if it does it's not an easy answer. Which is harder to shoot??

Many people on here can and haveRobinhood an arrow at normal distances of what 20 -40 yards? Many of us, can so routinely do it, we instruct each other not to shoot at the same dot!

How many can shoot a bullet exactly through the previous bullet hole at the normal distance of what 100 yards with a rifle..How about "Off-Hand" ?? Not Many! NOT Many!!