![]() |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat What a blissful answer to a simple question. Now, can you tell me the deer are in no way spooked/alarmed by the chemical smell in the dirt scented spray. This is a compound of one or more substances mixed together as a masking scent. Does it work? If yes, then to what degree? I don't know why this is hard for you to grasp. No, you did not say anything about deer. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
I just have a hard time believing (carte blanche) one scientist over another (________).
I guess we ought to just have a scent-lok ..to the death...grudge match. 3 falls with a 2 hour time limit.....man with most initials behind his name gets to name the lab they duke it out at. Winner gets to take a dump in the other's car and he can choose to wear the scentlok or not .....but he has to jump in bed with his wife immediately when he gets home. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d I want to know what new ideas you have..if current suits are ineffective..how would you do things differently and why would yours work where others have failed? Your not serious.......................are you? |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Obviously..I am. You seem to have researched this topic. You've been a nay-sayer for a long time. But now it sounds as if "it can work" from your standpoint, it's just being done wrong!
Am I asking for something, that you can't provide? Are you trying to get something on the market? If you have the knowledge that you seem to hint at ..it sounds like your sitting on a million $$ Idea. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: atlasman ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d I want to know what new ideas you have..if current suits are ineffective..how would you do things differently and why would yours work where others have failed? Your not serious.......................are you? I am just curious if you tried to sell to ScentLok or Blocker? |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: Germ If so have you contacted them with your idea? I think carbon is a dead man walking in the hunting world..........the market will soon change. If I am wrong and it doesn't I may get in touch with them. However it is my belief that the carbon companies will be the ones leading the charge away from carbon as more become aware of it's limitations in this field (look at this thread for example vs a couple years ago). They see the handwriting on the wall. I have no doubts that they will be just fine as they latch onto and promote the "next best thing". |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Next best thing is what???
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
doesn't I may get in touch with them |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
The military is engaged in searching for economical ways to reactivate their chem suits so they don't have to dispose of them and have apparently had some success. You can't access the full document on the net, but here is the abstract for methods of reactivating activated carbon clothing.
In the near future, chemical protective combat uniforms may be worn by Army personnel on a continuous basis. Activated carbon, the operative component, has diminished capacity for sorbing chemical agents after it has been exposed to dirt, sweat, cigarette smoke, engine exhaust, petroleum products and numerous other elements routinely present in the battlefield environment. This report summarizes the development of two nondestructive methods for cleaning and reactivating soiled chemical protective garments. Complete reactivation was achieved when the aqueous i-propanol iodine displacement method of Manes, which removed all but pure hydrocarbon oil soils from the current overgarment Type III foam or Kynol activated carbon fiber material, was applied in nonaqueous solvent. Subsequently, a nonaqueous solvent method that requires less handling was chosen in designing a truck-mounted system. It features non-agitative flow of methylene chloride and methanol around the chemical-protective garments suspended between ultrasonic transducers. Both methods restore full sorptivity to the Type III foam liner. There is a one-time 10% loss of activated carbon without any loss of sorptivity. The volatile solvents are more easily removed, and can be economically recovered. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d Am I asking for something, that you can't provide? Are you trying to get something on the market? If you have the knowledge that you seem to hint at ..it sounds like your sitting on a million $$ Idea. Inhaled insulin hit the market this year.........they have had this technology for a long time. It hit the market this year because someone FINALLY developed a way to make it profitable. That's a messy world. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d Next best thing is what??? |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
So let get this straight.
A Carbon suit with the Atlas design Could be used and reactivated You have not contacted Nick from ScentLok at all? |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
You have not already? |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: Germ You have not contacted Nick from ScentLok at all? I have spoken to him informally..........this was probably last year sometime. He is a nice guy.............he didn't like some of my posts but he seems pretty cool. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: Germ So let get this straight. A Carbon suit with the Atlas design Could be used and reactivated ![]() You're gettin' a little carried away now..............where was this yesterday when you flamed out 3 pages short on your called shot :eek: |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Someone please hand me some shades. The lightbulb in my head is getting brighter and brighter.:D
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Isthis silver lining effective??
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
The chemical smell is................dirt. Are you having trouble following this? You twist the nossle and spray it on whatever you want to smell like dirt. Sense is not the issue. It's Scents. Now, if cover scents and scent killers work to a degree. To a degree I said. Pay attention son.I say,I say,pay attention. Then to what degree does Scentlok work?Some? Not at all? A little? A lot? You see, if the rest of the products even work a little you will use it or try it. If they don't, then you won't try it because you have no faith in it or do not "believe" in it. This is the sense part. If it works to an extent, it may help. If it does not work to any extent, it is garbage. Scentlok has not been proven beyond a doubt, that it does not work to any extent. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
don't think you need it can be a added bonus tho
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: atlasman ORIGINAL: Germ So let get this straight. A Carbon suit with the Atlas design Could be used and reactivated ![]() You're gettin' a little carried away now..............where was this yesterday when you flamed out 3 pages short on your called shot :eek: So first you said you may have contacted scentLok, now we see you did, but it was informal. I would think they would have jumped at it. Nick is a nice guy, I hope you were all business when you contacted them and did not say "What is it worth to you guys" or something like that;) There it is Atlas knows how to reactivate carbon suit. So the Science is Scentlok is a bust, but the Science of Atlas rocks;) |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Well Atlas, as usual you have reduced the discussion to insulting someone's intelligence. But I forgot , you "ARE ALL THAT".
[qoute]archer, your lack of understanding in this arena is obvious. It makes having this discussion rather difficult."[quote/] How do you know? |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat No, my friend, the chemical smell, to you, is dirt. But the "fact" that deer can break down scents to so many parts per million more than you, let's me know that they probably can smell way more in that "compound than you can. Are you having trouble following that? Here ended the lesson. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: Germ So first you said you may have contacted scentLok, now we see you did, but it was informal. I would think they would have jumped at it. Nick is a nice guy, I hope you were all business when you contacted them and did not say "What is it worth to you guys" or something like that;) the Science of Atlas rocks;) ![]() |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: archer58 Well Atlas, as usual you have reduced the discussion to insulting someone's intelligence. Too bad you feel that way archer..........it was not my intention. There is a big difference between education and intelligence. I know nothing about engines and would not be able to have a very good conversation with a mechanic..........that's all I meant. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Intersting
Have a good one. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
atlas, you are obviously educated in the science of all this, and as a point of curiosity and not belittlement, what is your education in this matter? I think you've posted that in one of these debates before, but I can't recall.
And again, as a point of interest and NOT belittlement, I ask you to prove why it doesn't work. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: mobowhuntr atlas, you are obviously educated in the science of all this, and as a point of curiosity and not belittlement, what is your education in this matter? I think you've posted that in one of these debates before, but I can't recall. And again, as a point of interest and NOT belittlement, I ask you to prove why it doesn't work. Believe it or not mo..........I really don't feel like retyping all that crap right now. I am gonna go to Gander and grab some arrows or something because I have been sitting here typing in the hopes it would stop raining so I could go shoot but it doesn't look good. I'm sure this will be pages longer by the time I get back so at least you will know I wasn't ignoring you. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: Arthur P The military is engaged in searching for economical ways to reactivate their chem suits so they don't have to dispose of them and have apparently had some success. You can't access the full document on the net, but here is the abstract for methods of reactivating activated carbon clothing. In the near future, chemical protective combat uniforms may be worn by Army personnel on a continuous basis. Activated carbon, the operative component, has diminished capacity for sorbing chemical agents after it has been exposed to dirt, sweat, cigarette smoke, engine exhaust, petroleum products and numerous other elements routinely present in the battlefield environment. This report summarizes the development of two nondestructive methods for cleaning and reactivating soiled chemical protective garments. Complete reactivation was achieved when the aqueous i-propanol iodine displacement method of Manes, which removed all but pure hydrocarbon oil soils from the current overgarment Type III foam or Kynol activated carbon fiber material, was applied in nonaqueous solvent. Subsequently, a nonaqueous solvent method that requires less handling was chosen in designing a truck-mounted system. It features non-agitative flow of methylene chloride and methanol around the chemical-protective garments suspended between ultrasonic transducers. Both methods restore full sorptivity to the Type III foam liner. There is a one-time 10% loss of activated carbon without any loss of sorptivity. The volatile solvents are more easily removed, and can be economically recovered. Read Arthur P's post and you will see that this very problem is trying to be tackled by the U.S. government for our troops. They are dealing with the same stuff...Activated Carbon.....and they are having trouble re-activating/re-generating them so what makes you think you can do it in your dryer? I guess the military should just contact Scent-lok and be done with it...problem solved.:eek::eek::eek: Until someone can prove to me that the suits can be re-generated/re-activated back to a usable state I won't waste my money on it. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
That's cool atlas....In fact, if you've done that before and can find the link, just post up the link dude.....That's good enough.
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
I'd like to add a point in regards to the carbon that the military is using.
In a few of the military articles I came across, a reference was made to the amount of carbon being used. The military uses much more carbon than you would find in a SL suit. I remember a thickness of 1/4" being referenced. The military uses carbon to keep chemical warefare agents "OUT" and is not trying to adsorb an odor from within. The uses are of an obvious difference. As such, I would think the re-activation process necessary would be dramatically different. Logic would dictate that it takes alot more heat/regeneration processes to work on a 1/4" of carbon than a thin layer that is in SL. That being said, keep in mind that SL is not trying to adsorb a deadly chemical agent..... Unless you ate suicide wings the night before. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat No, my friend, the chemical smell, to you, is dirt. But the "fact" that deer can break down scents to so many parts per million more than you, let's me know that they probably can smell way more in that "compound than you can. Are you having trouble following that? You need to prove that to me.........and since you said "probably" I already know you can't ;) Here ended the lesson. Oh and by the way, there never was a lesson. You read that on your own. LT |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: archer58 I'd like to add a point in regards to the carbon that the military is using. In a few of the military articles I came across, a reference was made to the amount of carbon being used. The military uses much more carbon than you would find in a SL suit. I remember a thickness of 1/4" being referenced. The military uses carbon to keep chemical warefare agents "OUT" and is not trying to adsorb an odor from within. The uses are of an obvious difference. As such, I would think the re-activation process necessary would be dramatically different. Logic would dictate that it takes alot more heat/regeneration processes to work on a 1/4" of carbon than a thin layer that is in SL. That being said, keep in mind that SL is not trying to adsorb a deadly chemical agent..... Unless you ate suicide wings the night before. Again, I never said the scent blocking suits don't absorb scent, they do....But what happens once they are full? I have yet so see scientific proof that they can be re-activated/re-generated (same thing) in a home dryer ENOUGH to be useful again. Until then, I'm not buying it. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: BigJ12 Again, I never said the scent blocking suits don't absorb scent, they do....But what happens once they are full? I have yet so see scientific proof that they can be re-activated/re-generated (same thing) in a home dryer ENOUGH to be useful again. Until then, I'm not buying it. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
tt
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
I am one of those guys that if i had the money to just throw into a scen-lok/blocker suit i probably would just because i would feel that i had an edge. Will i buy one now.....not in the near future. Like i said if i had the money to burn i would....but i would not rely 100% on that alone.
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Absolutely NOT. It is overrated and I myself have shot more deer without it than with it. For one, it is way OVERPRICED. Remember, majority of guys on TV get it for FREE and it is normally a sponsor. Save your money and invest it in your equipment such as a good bow/broadheads/etc. As long as you wash them with scent free soap OR even baking soda and keep them in a plastic tub; get dressed in the field and still hunt the wind you do not need scent lock ..IF you have it you STILL need to hunt the wind. Dont get caught up EVERY thing that is brought to the market place.
|
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: archer58 I'd like to add a point in regards to the carbon that the military is using. In a few of the military articles I came across, a reference was made to the amount of carbon being used. The military uses much more carbon than you would find in a SL suit. I remember a thickness of 1/4" being referenced. The military uses carbon to keep chemical warefare agents "OUT" and is not trying to adsorb an odor from within. The uses are of an obvious difference. As such, I would think the re-activation process necessary would be dramatically different. Logic would dictate that it takes alot more heat/regeneration processes to work on a 1/4" of carbon than a thin layer that is in SL. That being said, keep in mind that SL is not trying to adsorb a deadly chemical agent..... Unless you ate suicide wings the night before. Perfect example of what I meant when I said you just don't understand. |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat Oh so now atlas has a better sniffer than the deer. Not even close to what I said..........you need to read slower. If anyone needs to prove to you that deer can smell even 10 times better than you, you have a serious malfunction of the old cerebral cortex my friend. Oh and by the way, there never was a lesson. You read that on your own. LT |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
Well first off I would like to know how to import an emoticon. There is another site that I visit regularly that has a smiley head with a stick in it's hand beating a horse that is laying on the ground. Pretty funny actually.
Now to relate two first hand experiences: First on how important the wind is..... i was on a hog hunt in Brady, TXsitting in a ground blind fashioned out of tree limbs that formedthe blind on two sides, a tree(read tall bush...remember it is texas) formed the third side. It was roughly 80+ degrees out and high humidity, with an occasional breeze. I had a doe walk out of the trees from upwind, to within 10 ft of me. She passed right in front of my blind, so close i was tempted to touch her. She then stood looking at the feeder that i was hunting for a good 5 minutes. The wind was gently blowing but in the right direction. Once the wind changed and she got a whiff of me you would have swore thatI stuck her with a hot poker, she must have jumped 10 ft in the air and hauled a$$. Second topic is about my experience with the chemical suits that the military uses. Up until 2-3 years ago the suits that the military used were only good for less than 24 hrs once they had been removed from thier sealed packaging. They consisted of a charcoal layer that was btwn 1/8 - 1/4 inch thick and it was a solid layer of charcoal. Trust me on this as i tore one of them apart because i was going to have to wear it for 12+ hrs and didn't want to sweat to death (for an exercise). The new suits are reusable and can be washed in a normal washer and reused in a chemical environment. If that technology is good enough for a chemical environment then as long as the product put out for commercial use is 90 percent of that level then maybe it is worth a try. i cannot say how good Scentlok is, I am going to try it though this year and more importantly I am going to hunt with the wind when I can. jm2c |
RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
![]() Proven Effective Just For Folks Like You atlasman. If you really wanna get close to the spikers, this should do it. LT (By the way I have the patent on this suit so don't get any ideas) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.