Would you knowingly break the law?
05-17-2007 | 10:44 AM
#161
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
From: Portage WI/Racine WI
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
05-17-2007 | 10:46 AM
#162
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: burbaust99
And you're not? It seems to me that you have been just as hard headed on this one as the rest of the people in this conversation. Just what I've observed though...
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
We can say it here, but when comes time to do so, some my not do so.
05-17-2007 | 10:53 AM
#163
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: Germ
I think he is talking about saying "I would just go get my deer"
We can say it here, but when comes time to do so, some my not do so.
ORIGINAL: burbaust99
And you're not? It seems to me that you have been just as hard headed on this one as the rest of the people in this conversation. Just what I've observed though...
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
We can say it here, but when comes time to do so, some my not do so.
Like it or not guys, situational ethics are a REALITY!!! That is why guys put up different senarios ..... the answer ALL depends on the situation!!! Now making it sound like there are meth dealers around every bush .... that's stretching it .... just a little
05-17-2007 | 11:17 AM
#165
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,167
Likes: 0
From: PA
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: burbaust99
And you're not? It seems to me that you have been just as hard headed on this one as the rest of the people in this conversation. Just what I've observed though...
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
Every ones ten foot tall and bullet proof standing behind their key board.
05-17-2007 | 02:14 PM
#166
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Treasure Lake DuBois,Pa.
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: Germ
Archer58 there are some landowners in MI where my buddies hunts where it won't go to court[
] These guys are nuts
Man I am sure glad my neighbors and I have good communication
ORIGINAL: archer58
Pretty interesting thread GMMAT.
I'm going to get the deer. Big or small, doesn't matter to me. I owe it to the animal.
If the land owner catches me and is going to be an ***hole about it, especially if I have no intention of damaging his property, which I would not , I guess I'll see him in court and maybe pay my fine.
Even if you hunted away from the line you never know what way the deer will run and how far.
I've changed my mind about the issue. I posted in the 10 yard thread I wouldn't go get the deer if I couldn't see where it dropped ,I believe I would. Size doesn't matter.
Pretty interesting thread GMMAT.
I'm going to get the deer. Big or small, doesn't matter to me. I owe it to the animal.
If the land owner catches me and is going to be an ***hole about it, especially if I have no intention of damaging his property, which I would not , I guess I'll see him in court and maybe pay my fine.
Even if you hunted away from the line you never know what way the deer will run and how far.
I've changed my mind about the issue. I posted in the 10 yard thread I wouldn't go get the deer if I couldn't see where it dropped ,I believe I would. Size doesn't matter.
] These guys are nutsMan I am sure glad my neighbors and I have good communication
05-17-2007 | 02:30 PM
#167
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: archer58
It is possible it could get ugly, but I guess I have alot of faith in my fellow man. I would hope he wuold listen to reason for the animal's sake.
ORIGINAL: Germ
Archer58 there are some landowners in MI where my buddies hunts where it won't go to court[] These guys are nuts
Man I am sure glad my neighbors and I have good communication
ORIGINAL: archer58
Pretty interesting thread GMMAT.
I'm going to get the deer. Big or small, doesn't matter to me. I owe it to the animal.
If the land owner catches me and is going to be an ***hole about it, especially if I have no intention of damaging his property, which I would not , I guess I'll see him in court and maybe pay my fine.
Even if you hunted away from the line you never know what way the deer will run and how far.
I've changed my mind about the issue. I posted in the 10 yard thread I wouldn't go get the deer if I couldn't see where it dropped ,I believe I would. Size doesn't matter.
Pretty interesting thread GMMAT.
I'm going to get the deer. Big or small, doesn't matter to me. I owe it to the animal.
If the land owner catches me and is going to be an ***hole about it, especially if I have no intention of damaging his property, which I would not , I guess I'll see him in court and maybe pay my fine.
Even if you hunted away from the line you never know what way the deer will run and how far.
I've changed my mind about the issue. I posted in the 10 yard thread I wouldn't go get the deer if I couldn't see where it dropped ,I believe I would. Size doesn't matter.
] These guys are nutsMan I am sure glad my neighbors and I have good communication
05-17-2007 | 02:33 PM
#168
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: Germ
Ever notice when a big set of Antlers are involed how quickly reason leaves
ORIGINAL: archer58
It is possible it could get ugly, but I guess I have alot of faith in my fellow man. I would hope he wuold listen to reason for the animal's sake.
ORIGINAL: Germ
Archer58 there are some landowners in MI where my buddies hunts where it won't go to court[] These guys are nuts
Man I am sure glad my neighbors and I have good communication
ORIGINAL: archer58
Pretty interesting thread GMMAT.
I'm going to get the deer. Big or small, doesn't matter to me. I owe it to the animal.
If the land owner catches me and is going to be an ***hole about it, especially if I have no intention of damaging his property, which I would not , I guess I'll see him in court and maybe pay my fine.
Even if you hunted away from the line you never know what way the deer will run and how far.
I've changed my mind about the issue. I posted in the 10 yard thread I wouldn't go get the deer if I couldn't see where it dropped ,I believe I would. Size doesn't matter.
Pretty interesting thread GMMAT.
I'm going to get the deer. Big or small, doesn't matter to me. I owe it to the animal.
If the land owner catches me and is going to be an ***hole about it, especially if I have no intention of damaging his property, which I would not , I guess I'll see him in court and maybe pay my fine.
Even if you hunted away from the line you never know what way the deer will run and how far.
I've changed my mind about the issue. I posted in the 10 yard thread I wouldn't go get the deer if I couldn't see where it dropped ,I believe I would. Size doesn't matter.
] These guys are nutsMan I am sure glad my neighbors and I have good communication
05-17-2007 | 03:03 PM
#169
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: West Tennessee
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
A lot has happened since I was on here last. Looks like some have modified their point of view while others have stood fast to thier initial position.
I like the phrase "situational ethics". It's a great concept right up until the emotional aspect comes crashing in. Ethical decision makingbased on strong emotional input is a recipe for disaster.
Is it actually possible that doing something "wrong" is the "right" thing to do? I believe that in some instances it is.
This has been a great thread with a lot of great input. I don't believe anyone has really been wrong. I think part of the problem is that it's not a "yes" or "no" question. I believe it is, and always will be, an "it depends" question.
I like the phrase "situational ethics". It's a great concept right up until the emotional aspect comes crashing in. Ethical decision makingbased on strong emotional input is a recipe for disaster.
Is it actually possible that doing something "wrong" is the "right" thing to do? I believe that in some instances it is.
This has been a great thread with a lot of great input. I don't believe anyone has really been wrong. I think part of the problem is that it's not a "yes" or "no" question. I believe it is, and always will be, an "it depends" question.
05-17-2007 | 03:07 PM
#170
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
RE: Would you knowingly break the law?
ORIGINAL: LittleChief
A lot has happened since I was on here last. Looks like some have modified their point of view while others have stood fast to thier initial position.
I like the phrase "situational ethics". It's a great concept right up until the emotional aspect comes crashing in. Ethical decision makingbased on strong emotional input is a recipe for disaster.
Is it actually possible that doing something "wrong" is the "right" thing to do? I believe that in some instances it is.
This has been a great thread with a lot of great input. I don't believe anyone has really been wrong. I think part of the problem is that it's not a "yes" or "no" question. I believe it is, and always will be, an "it depends" question.
A lot has happened since I was on here last. Looks like some have modified their point of view while others have stood fast to thier initial position.
I like the phrase "situational ethics". It's a great concept right up until the emotional aspect comes crashing in. Ethical decision makingbased on strong emotional input is a recipe for disaster.
Is it actually possible that doing something "wrong" is the "right" thing to do? I believe that in some instances it is.
This has been a great thread with a lot of great input. I don't believe anyone has really been wrong. I think part of the problem is that it's not a "yes" or "no" question. I believe it is, and always will be, an "it depends" question.