neck4752

Anyone use either of these? What are the benefits of each and what are the cons?

Thanks
Jim

passthru79

Ive used both and I would pick the QAD hands down. Its a full containment, you dont have to worry about clearing your broadhead blades on your bow shelf. Even though its plastic, its still very durable.

GMMAT

I ONLY have experience with the QAD. I've utilized ot for over a year with NO issues. I bought it for one reason......I can add moleskin to it with no issues.....and it's dead quiet.

YooperMike

I also use the QAD and haven't even considered switching. Great rest, full contain, no noise, and works without any problems.

HuntingEd

Ive used both the QAD ultra rest, and QAD LD, both have impressed me. Great accuracy, complete containment, ease of adjustment.

Xtremebone

The QAD LD, hand down...I have one and luv it so far the best rest I have ever owned.

TROPHYHUNTER25

AGAINST THE GRAIN SHAKEY

BackwoodsBuck

Don't know about the QAD LD but I use the QAD ultra rest and I love it.

hardcorehunter

I have used a Trophy taker for four years and it is an excellent all metal rest. The shakey is on my Bowtech and the original TT is on my 3rd bow since I 1st bought it. It has performed perfectly on my bows, my wifes, and my kids'.

Germ

I have usedthemboth

I give a slight edge to Ultra rest LD for two reasons

1.Lock down, no bounce back
2.Ability to let down your bow without setting it off.

I give a slight edge to the TT on Tuning though. The Ultra rest is a litttle harder sometimes.

Either way you have a winner